My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-03-14_REPORT - C1982056 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2013-03-14_REPORT - C1982056 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:14:59 PM
Creation date
3/14/2013 12:52:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/14/2013
Doc Name
2012 Annual Hydrology Report
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2012
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring requirements at sites 307 and 305 require monthly water level measurements (March through <br />September), and semi- annual field parameters. However, per PRO3 -06, site 305 now requires semi- annual water <br />quality testing. <br />Three relatively new surface sites were added in conjunction with the new Fish Creek Alluvium well sites (AVF - <br />13, AVF -14, and AVF -15), in order to evaluate potential subsidence impacts in the area. These are surface sites <br />SW -13, SW -14 (both added in August 2001), and SW -15 (added in June 2002). These sites require quarterly <br />water level measurements (March through September), and semi- annual field parameters and water quality <br />sampling. 2011 saw Fish Creek go dry in August due to drought conditions. <br />Tables 37 through 45 provide summaries of the 2012 Water Year data collected at Fish Creek surface flow sites. <br />Tables 37a through 45a provide some historical summaries of collected data at each site for comparison. Figures <br />60 through 91 provide graphical representations of water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at <br />each site. Again, typical flow patterns were exhibited at these sites with spring runoff periods accounting for the <br />peak flows observed. In general, an inverse relationship between flow and field conductivity was evident. 2006 <br />water quality parameters for these sites were generally within previously established ranges. <br />New surface sites SW -13, SW -14, and SW -15 (Tables 43 -45, Figures 66 -77) indicated elevated concentrations <br />for total recoverable (TR) iron in early June 2003, however iron concentrations dropped dramatically (about an <br />order of magnitude) by August 2003. With the exception of TR iron, none of the values recorded during the <br />initial sampling episode fell outside the typical historical range of other surface sites on Fish Creek. In 2012 iron <br />values ranged between 180 ug/L to a high of 1260 ug/L. This is typical for historical seasonal fluctuations, with <br />spikes often seen during high runoff period, most likely relating to fresh erosion. <br />Trout Creek: 2011 was a significant drought year that saw Trout Creek with extremely low flows, although it <br />did not go dry. Three surface flow monitoring sites on Trout Creek are utilized. Site 301 is located on Trout <br />Creek above the confluence with Middle Creek. Site 69 is located on Trout Creek below the confluence with <br />Middle Creek. Site 1005 (established in 1994) is located downstream of the confluence with Fish Creek and is <br />monitored in conjunction with alluvial well 008-AT-1. <br />Tables 46 through 48 provide summaries of the 2012 Water Year data collected at Trout Creek surface flow sites. <br />Tables 46a and 48a provide historical summaries of collected data at sites 301, 69, and 1005. Figures 92 through <br />101 provide graphical representations of water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at each site. <br />For the most part, typical seasonal flow patterns were observed. Water quality parameters for these sites are <br />typically within previously established ranges. <br />Middle Creek: 2012 data for site 29, located on Middle Creek below the confluence with Foidel Creek, is <br />provided in Table 49. An historical summary of water quality data is provided in Table 49a. Figures 106 through <br />108 provide graphical representations of water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at site 29. <br />Water quality parameters for these sites were typically within previously established ranges. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.