Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br />Only two Colorado squawfish confirmed spawning sites, as defined in the <br />Colorado Squawfish Recovery Plan, have been located in the Upper Basin: river <br />mile 16.5 of the Yampa River and river mile 156.6 of the Green River. These <br />areas have the common characteristics of coarse cobble or boulder substrates <br />forming rapids or riffles associated with deeper pools or eddies. It is <br />believed that a stable, clean substrate is necessary for spawning and <br />incubation. Substrates are swept clean of finer sediments by high flows <br />scouring the bed prior to the spawning period. <br />O'Brien (1984) studied the hydraulic and sediment transport dynamics of the <br />cobble bar within the Yampa River spawning site and duplicated some of its <br />characteristics in a laboratory flume study. Based on field observations, he <br />reported: <br />"On the rising limb of the hydrograph, sands are deposited in the <br />cobble interstices. These sands are interchanged between the bed <br />and the suspended zone for discharges less than bankfull. <br />Depending on the supply- capacity relationship, either deposition <br />or scour could be occurring. When the cobbles move, the sand, of <br />course, is washed from the interstices and may be completely <br />removed from around the cobbles. Rearrangement of the cobbles <br />will result in more stability of the armor layer. On the falling <br />limb, the armor layer becomes a trap for sands until finally, the <br />sand reservoir is again filled. Without cobble movement, sand <br />will be scoured only to a depth of one -half to one median cobble <br />diameter below the cobble bed surface." <br />In the flume experiments, the sand level was observed approximately <br />0.50 to 1 cobble diameter below the surface of the cobble bed, which compared <br />to field observations of sand depth at approximately 0.50 to 1 median cobble <br />diameter. O'Brien reported a cobble size range of 50 -100 mm with a median <br />size of 75 mm at the spawning site. Milhous (1982) proposes discharges of <br />approximately 0.50 of that required to initiate cobble movement will be <br />capable of extracting sands and fines from the cobble substrate. Thus, after <br />the supply of sand diminishes, flows of sufficient magnitude and duration are <br />required to scour the cobble bed in preparation for spawning and incubation. <br />Although the location of spawning areas in the Colorado River is not well <br />defined, the presence of larvae near the confluence of the Gunnison River, in <br />the Loma to Black Rocks reach and near the confluence of the Dolores River, <br />demonstrates that spawning does occur. Kaeding and Osmundson (1987) reported <br />that water temperatures in the Colorado River were suitable for spawning in <br />the Grand Junction area. In 1986, a year of high runoff, suitable <br />temperatures for spawning (20 °C) occurred in the first week of August. <br />Miller et al. (1982) and Archer et al. (1986) demonstrated that Colorado <br />squawfish often migrate considerable distances to spawn in the Green and Yampa <br />Rivers, and similar movement has been noted in the main stem Colorado River. <br />Miller et al. (1982) concluded from collections of larvae and young -of -year <br />below known spawning sites that there is a downstream drift of larval Colorado <br />squawfish following hatching. Extensive studies in the Yampa and upper Green <br />