Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />Colorado squawfish in the 10 -mile reach immediately downstream of the <br />confluence of the Gunnison River (river miles 160 -170) warranted <br />classification of this reach as a "Young -of -Year Nursery Area" by the Basin <br />Biology Subcommittee (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1984). <br />Nonsspawning Adult Occurrence <br />Although the sampling effort was similar between the reaches upstream and <br />downstream of the Gunnison River, over 60 percent of the adult -size Colorado <br />squawfish collected during spring surveys by the Fishery Project (Miller <br />et al. 1982; Kaeding and Osmundson 1987) came from the upstream 15 -mile reach. <br />Kaeding and Osmundson (1987) reported that adult Colorado squawfish catch <br />rates in the upstream 15 -mile reach were twice as high as those in the <br />adjacent downstream river reach. Adults were most abundant in a 0.6 -mile <br />segment (river miles 174.4 - 215.0) of the 15 -mile reach during high water, <br />particularly in two gravel -pit ponds that were accessible during high flows. <br />These fish may have moved into these ponds to feed and rest, or they may have <br />been attracted to the warm, productive environments that the ponds provided <br />(pond temperatures were as much as 10.5 °C warmer than the adjacent river). <br />Some of the squawfish captured from one pond were well tuberculated by June 3, <br />when nearby river temperatures were only 10 °C -13 °C (Kaeding, pers. comm.). <br />It has been hypothesized by some investigators that thermal energy units above <br />those provided in the mainstream are important to gonadal maturation. If this <br />is true, then access to these sheltered off - channel pools may be very <br />important to successful spawning in the upper reaches of the Colorado River. <br />The 15 -mile reach has experienced major agricultural water depletions for many <br />years. During late summer and early fall, this reach can be severely <br />dewatered. Water depletions in the 15 -mile reach have been identified as a <br />limiting factor for Colorado squawfish. Therefore, the Service has <br />recommended a flow of 700 -1200 cfs during July, August, and September <br />(Osmundson and Kaeding 1989). The objectives of these flows are to provide <br />near maximum aggregate amount of run, pool, and riffle habitat for adult <br />Colorado squawfish and to enhance the first -year growth of age -0 Colorado <br />squawfish in the Grand Valley area by increasing water temperatures. Flow <br />recommendations for the rest of the year call for high spring flows that are <br />critical for shaping the river channel, determining substrate composition, and <br />influencing the abundance of various species for the remainder of the year. <br />Flow recommendations for winter call for flows between 1,000 and 2,000 cfs <br />(no change from current flows). <br />Razorback Sucker <br />The razorback sucker, an endemic species unique to the Colorado River Basin, <br />was historically abundant and widely distributed within warmwater reaches <br />throughout the Colorado River Basin. Historically, razorback suckers were <br />found in the main stem Colorado River and major tributaries in Arizona, <br />California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, and in Mexico (Ellis <br />1914; Minckley 1983). Bestgen (1990) reported that this species was once so <br />numerous that it was commonly used as food by early settlers and, further, <br />that commercially marketable quantities were caught in Arizona as recently <br />