My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-03-07_REVISION - C1981035 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2013-03-07_REVISION - C1981035 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:14:36 PM
Creation date
3/7/2013 1:22:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/7/2013
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
secondary use being wildlife habitat. The haul road of the King I Mine will remain for <br />access to the site as requested by the landowner, Mr. Lawrence Huntington. The haul road <br />at the King 11 Mine will be reclaimed. GCC is not proposing any alternative land use but a <br />restoration of the area to its pre- mining land uses. <br />The Division finds, pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(1), that the proposed post- mining land use <br />of the permit area meets the requirements of Rule 4.16. <br />XIII. Protection of Fish, Wildlife and Related Environmental Values — Rule 4.18 <br />Fish and wildlife habitat is a planned post- mining land use. The applicant has selected <br />appropriate plant species and distributions to benefit fish and wildlife (4.18(5)(i)). <br />Information pertaining to fish and wildlife is presented in Section 2.04.11 of the permit <br />application. GCC contacted the local office of the Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />requesting their assistance in assessing any potential impacts the mining operation may <br />have on wildlife. A copy of the Division of Wildlife's response is found in Section 2.04.11 <br />and Exhibit 6. <br />The general area of the mine site is considered critical deer winter range. However, it is <br />the Division of Wildlife's opinion that, because of the long history of mining in the area, <br />many of the impacts to wildlife have already occurred. The Division of Wildlife explained <br />in a letter dated May 4, 2006 that the small size of the King II Mine surface disturbance (< <br />20 acres) has minimal potential for impacts to wildlife. <br />A Memorandum from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to the Office of Surface Mining, <br />dated March 3, 2006, indicates the activities proposed by the applicant would not affect the <br />continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or <br />adverse modification of their critical habitats <br />Based upon the available information, the Division finds, pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(n), <br />that the activities will not affect the continued existence of endangered or threatened <br />species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat. <br />XIV. Protection of Underground Mining — Rule 4.19 <br />The King Coal Mine is an underground operation, with no surface mining activities <br />proposed. The mine is therefore in compliance with this section. <br />XV. Subsidence Control — Rule 4.20 <br />Information submitted indicates there are two structures, the Huntington Irrigation Ditch <br />and the Crawford Irrigation Ditch, in the permit area which have the potential for mine <br />related subsidence impacts. Both structures are on the King I Mine. Impacts on these <br />structures will be monitored by quarterly visual inspections for evidence of subsidence <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.