Laserfiche WebLink
Cliffhouse. Therefore, if the workings fill with water, and subsidence fractures <br />convey that water to the Cliffhouse Sandstone, then impacts could possibly occur to <br />the water quality in the Cliffhouse Sandstone aquifer down -dip from the workings, if <br />mine water is lower quality than ambient ground water. Significant flow from the <br />workings to the Cliffhouse through subsidence fractures is unlikely, however, <br />because head in the overlying (higher elevation) Cliffhouse would be greater than the <br />head exerted by the mine water. The State Engineer's records show two wells have <br />been completed in the Cliffhouse Sandstone approximately one mile downgradient <br />from the King I Mine workings (the L. Paulek and G. Paulek wells). <br />Menefee Formation Like the Cliffhouse Sandstone, mining impacts to the Menefee <br />Formation are improbable because it is unlikely the workings of the King I and 11 <br />Mines will fill with water. <br />Ground water points of compliance are not warranted for the Hay Gulch alluvium, <br />the Menefee Formation, the Cliffhouse Sandstone, or the Point Lookout Sandstone <br />because, as explained above, the King I and 11 Mines lack the potential to negatively <br />impact these units. <br />Surface Water Effects <br />With the exception of two small area exemptions, all runoff from the disturbed area <br />at the mine site will be routed through sediment ponds. Effects of mining on this <br />water will involve changes in the magnitude and duration of runoff and changes in <br />water quality. <br />The effects on water quantity are expected to be minimal. A decrease in <br />permeability due to the construction or roads and buildings can be expected to cause <br />an increase in runoff amounts. The rate of runoff will increase over natural <br />conditions because of the increased efficiency of conveyance channels. However, <br />these effects are moderated by the detention of runoff in the pond and subsequent <br />evaporation of pond water. In general, only slight changes in the hydrologic balance <br />of surface water are expected due to the underground mining operations proposed at <br />the King I and 11 Mines. <br />Changes in water quality can be expected to occur as a result of mining. Increases in <br />erosion rates are expected from the disturbance of soils and vegetation; however, <br />these are compensated by deposition of sediment in the sediment ponds. An increase <br />in total dissolved solids (TDS) may occur from well water pumped and used for dust <br />suppression and other operational use. Evaporation of water standing in the ponds <br />may also cause an increase in TDS, although the increase above background <br />concentrations (1500 -2000 mg/1) is not expected to be large. <br />The Division has determined that probable hydrologic effects on surface water <br />identified above will not preclude use of the water below the point of discharge from <br />the mine. This conclusion is based on the small and infrequent flows relative to the <br />In <br />