Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 6 <br />5. Division's Initial Comment: Proposed page 2.04 -9.1 omits discussion on the Peabody <br />Sage Creek Mine overland conveyor, 15LT Rock Dust Tank, 16LT Utility Borehole, <br />2011 -2012 Exploration, and 2012 WMD Exploration as found on approved page 2.04- <br />9.1. Please provide an updated proposed page 2.04 -9.1 to include omitted required <br />information. <br />TC Response: The referenced page has been reviewed and revised to include all relevant <br />information. Copies of revised pages accompany these responses for replacement in the <br />PAP. This response is adequate. <br />6. Division's Initial Comment. The boundaries of the WMD are identified on approved <br />permit page 2.04 -11, under the heading of Western Mining District. Based on the <br />information presented in the PR -9 application this information will require revision. <br />Approved page 2.04 -11 states that, "the area is bounded on the east by one of the primary <br />faults (orient NNW to SSE)." Please revise page 2.04 -11 to reflect the correct boundary <br />based on the proposed longwall panel extensions and panel additions in the WMD. <br />TC's Response: The referenced page has been reviewed and revised to reflect the <br />revised boundaries for the WMD given the proposed changes in the mine plans and <br />configuration. Copies of the revised page accompany these responses for replacement in <br />the PAP. This response is adequate. <br />7. Division's Initial Comment: It appears that proposed pages 2.04 -16.4 and 16.5 is <br />numbered incorrectly based on the approved pages. Please renumber the proposed pages <br />to 2.04 -16.3 and 16.4. <br />TC Response: The referenced page has been reviewed and revised to include all relevant <br />information. Copies of revised pages accompany these responses for replacement in the <br />PAP. This response is adequate. <br />8. Division's Initial Comment: TC included a proposed page 2.04 -80.2. The information <br />identified on the propose page is listed on approved page 2.04 -79 and 80. If an edit of the <br />pages is required, please see the approved pages for text. <br />TC Response: The comment is correct. The referenced pages have been reviewed and <br />copies of a revised page 2.04 -79 accompany these responses for replacement in the PAP <br />(page 2.04 -80.2 eliminated). This response is adequate. <br />9. Division's Initial Comment. Proposed Map 23 has omitted longwall panels that are <br />currently approved to be mined or have been mined. Approved Map 23 identifies the <br />western most panel of the WMD as Panel 18 Left. The proposed Map 23 identifies the <br />western most panel of the WMD as 17 Left. In addition, the proposed 12 Left outby <br />Panel timing is not identified on the proposed Map 23. Please revise Maps 23, 23B, and <br />23C to reflect the approved and proposed mine plan. <br />