Laserfiche WebLink
6.4.5 Exhibit E- Reclamation Plan <br />1) The proposed Reclamation for the site is to change it from the previously approved clay <br />lined water storage to a backfilled pit to two feet above the historical ground water level. <br />The operator proposes to accomplish this task by importing inert fill as part of the backfill. <br />Please describe how the Reclamation Plan will be implemented to meet each application of <br />requirements of Section 3.1.5. (1) (3) and (4). <br />2) In accordance with Rule 6.4.5 (2)(f), please provide a brief description of (i) Final Grading - <br />specify maximum anticipated slope gradient;(ii) Seeding;(iii) Fertilization -if applicable; and <br />(v) Topsoiling <br />6.4.6 Exhibit F Reclamation Plan Map <br />1) Please provide a reclamation plan map in accordance with Rule 6.4.6 (a) and (b) <br />6.4.7 Exhibit G - Water Information <br />6.4.12 Exhibit L- Reclamation Cost <br />6.4.19 Exhibit S- Permanent Man -made Structures <br />1) Please provide proof that the operator has the appropriate water substitute or <br />augmentation plan approved by the State Engineer's office for evaporative loss from a <br />ground water source, until the pit is backfilled to two feet above the historical ground water <br />level. You stated under the Exhibit that your current approved water plan will expire on <br />10/31/12. <br />1) Under the reclamation cost you provided a total cost of $41,900.00. The cost includes a re- <br />vegetation cost of $24,500.00 and $17,400.00 to replace or backfill with clean inert fill. <br />However under Exhibit "E ", reclamation cost you estimated a total of 243,000 cubic yards of <br />inert material that will be needed to back fill the pit to two feet above the historical ground <br />water level. The Division will adjust this cost and send you a detailed reclamation warranty <br />calculation to reflect the actual cost and indirect cost based on the volumes and reclamation <br />plan you provided. <br />(a) Where the mining operation will adversely affect the stability of any significant, <br />valuable and permanent man -made structures located within two hundred (200) feet of <br />the affected land, the applicant may either provide a notarized compensation agreement <br />or an engineering study to show the proposed reclamation plan will not adversely affect <br />any manmade structures within 200feet of the proposed reclamation plan. Under the <br />pervious amendments there are 10 items listed as permanent structures within 200 feet <br />of the affected land. Are the agreements reached under the previous plan for these <br />structures still valid? Please explain. <br />