Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Loss Demonstration <br />A soil loss demonstration for the reclaimed disturbed area was incorporated into Section 2.05.3(4) of the <br />permit document with TR -10 and MR -11 in 2009. Sediment modeling indicates that there is no increase <br />in sediment loading from the mine site, and that in fact sediment production from the reclaimed area is <br />reduced in comparison to adjacent un -mined areas. The contribution of suspended solids to stream flow <br />outside the permit area was evaluated by comparison of vegetation cover within the permit area to an <br />adjacent undisturbed area. The Universal Soil Loss Equation was utilized to estimate the sediment loss <br />from the two areas. The results indicate that the revegetated area may lose 0.31 tons per acre per year to <br />erosion, while the baseline conditions may lose 0.35 tons per acre per year. The calculations also <br />demonstrate that untreated drainage from the reclaimed area will contribute fewer suspended solids to <br />stream flow outside the permit area than will untreated drainage from the natural surrounding area. In <br />conclusion there are no offsite impacts resulting from the operations at the Hamilton Mine site. <br />Permanent Sealing of Monitoring Wells and Completion of all Reclamation Obligations <br />One bedrock monitoring well BW -2 located within the permit boundary has recently been properly <br />plugged and abandoned at the Division's request. The other two bedrock monitoring wells BW -1 and <br />BW -3 are located off the permit boundary on David and Terri Andrews property. The Andrews wish to <br />retain these wells for future use and the Operator's consultant on behalf of the landowner filed for Well <br />Permits with the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Well permits were issued for BW 1 (Permit No. <br />290175) and BW3 (Permit No. 290176). With regard to the 7 alluvial wells AW -1 through AW -7, AW- <br />1, 2, and 3 have been permanently sealed. AW -4 and 6 located offsite along Naturita Creek have been <br />destroyed apparently due to their construction and location immediately adjacent to the creek. Wells <br />AW -5 and 7 also located offsite along Naturita Creek will be retained for use by the landowner John <br />Reams. Proper well permits for these wells were obtained by the Operator's consultant on behalf of the <br />landowner (AW -5; Permit No. 289878 and AW -7 Permit No. 28922). Rule 4.05.14(2) requires the <br />operator and the surface owner of the lands where the well is located to jointly submit a written request <br />for approval of transfer to the Division. The requests were submitted to the Division on December 31, <br />2012. Honeywood Coal Company submitted abandonment reports to the Division for wells that were <br />properly sealed and abandon including BW -2, and AW -1, 2, 3 on December 5, 2012. <br />The only remaining structure at the site is Pond B located on the Andrews property which will be <br />retained as a permanent post -mine feature as described above. The Operator has made the <br />demonstration required by Rule 4.05.9(13) for permanent impoundments. <br />Implementation of the Approved Post Mining Land Use <br />The approved post mine land use of Rangeland and Wildlife Habitat is discussed in section 2.05.5 of <br />the permit. The Operators reclamation plan and revegetation plan was designed to restore and <br />improve the disturbed land for these uses. As discussed in detail above, the entire site qualifies for <br />final Phase III bond release, the reclamation and revegetation plans have been implemented <br />successfully and the post mine land use has been achieved. It has been noted in Division inspections <br />that the reclaimed land has been utilized by cattle and wildlife throughout the reclaimed area <br />providing evidence this land is currently being used in the designed capacity. <br />Page 15 of 16 <br />