My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-02-06_REVISION - C1991078 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1991078
>
2013-02-06_REVISION - C1991078 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:54 PM
Creation date
2/8/2013 8:47:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/6/2013
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings
From
DRMS
To
Honeywood Coal Company
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Revegetation Success <br />Summary of Revegetation Monitoring <br />Honeywood Coal Company retained Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. to conduct vegetation monitoring on <br />the reclaimed land. Field sampling was conducted in July of 2010 and August 2011 to ascertain ground <br />cover, species diversity and production. There is not a woody plant density success standard for the site. <br />The Operator mined two distinct areas delineated as Mine Area No. 1 and Mine Area No. 3. Each of <br />these mine areas were sampled independently. The 3.4 acre area associated with Topsoil Stockpile No. l <br />was included with the sampling of Mine Area No. 1. Revegetation success is based upon comparison of <br />weighted averages from three reference areas; Grassland Reference Area (comprised of a north and <br />south parcel), Sagebrush Reference Area A and Sagebrush Reference Area B (Page 2.05 -26 of the <br />permit). Weighted comparisons are based upon the composition of respective pre- disturbance plant <br />communities originally sampled in 1991 and 1992 prior to mining in these areas. Mine Area No. 1 was <br />compared to a weighted mean of Sagebrush Reference Area A (89 %) and the Grassland Reference Area <br />(11 %). Mine Area No. 3 was compared to a weighted mean of Sagebrush Reference Area A (50 %) and <br />Sagebrush Reference Area B (50 %). Both reclamation parcels and all three reference areas were <br />sampled to statistical adequacy during the 2010 and 2011 field analysis. The species diversity success <br />measure for the site is found based on the cover data collected. The species diversity success standard <br />for the reclaimed areas is that at least two warm season perennial grasses, one cool season perennial <br />grass and one perennial forb with each contributing greater than 3 percent and less than 40 percent <br />relative cover be established. <br />Vegetation cover was measured using ground cover transects. The cover data was used to ascertain <br />species diversity of the reclaimed area. Production was measured using the harvest method within one <br />square meter production quadrats. In 2010, Mine Area No. 1 received 25 ground cover transects and 50 <br />production quadrats. In 2011, Mine Area No. 1 received 24 ground cover transects and 48 production <br />quadrats. In 2010 and 2011, Mine Area No. 3 received 25 ground cover transects and 50 production <br />quadrats both years. All three reference areas were sampled with 15 cover transects and 45 production <br />quadrats in both 2010 and 2011. An appropriately sized grid was used to overlay a map of the mining <br />areas and reference areas. Sample points were selected from this grid to accommodate the desired <br />sample size. The point- intercept method was used to sample ground cover using a laser point bar. 100 <br />intercepts per transect was collected. For the production quadrats, all above ground current annual and <br />perennial vegetation within the vertical boundaries of the quadrat frame were clipped and bagged by life <br />form (Perennial Grass, Perennial Forb, Sub - shrubs, Annual Grass, Annual Forbs and Noxious Weeds). <br />The samples were then taken to a lab and dried at 105 degrees centigrade and weighed. <br />Results of monitoring <br />Appendix A of the SL3 bond release application included the raw data for the cover transects and <br />production plots measured for both mining areas and all the reference areas. The data includes relative <br />cover percentages for each plant species as well as rock, litter and bare ground hits found. Total mean <br />plant cover and total perennial cover (excluding noxious weeds) was reported. For production, total <br />average production and average perennial production was reported in grams per square meter and <br />pounds per acre. Using this data the Division was able to evaluate the findings and determine if the site <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.