Laserfiche WebLink
Johnson, Chantell <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Subject: <br />Morgan - CDPHE, Kelly [kelly.morgan @state.co.us] <br />Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:35 PM <br />Johnson, Chantell <br />Re: 000000213 WET DMRs <br />Hi Chantell - <br />Yes, please hold off on submitting DMR for the outfall 007 WET results until you receive the new set. There <br />will not be a violation for submitting these late (same rationale as for outfall 013). <br />Please submit the summary results page /COC that you normally submit for the WET tests with the routine <br />DMR submittal so that we at least have information on record that the tests were completed as required. <br />Thanks <br />Kelly <br />On Thu, Jan 24. 2013 at 3:02 PM. Johnson, Chantell <cjohnsonca?tristategt.org> wrote: <br />Kelly — <br />Thanks for the following note. I have two questions: <br />1) What should we do about reporting for Outfall 007 WET data? There are two WET DMR reports that we typically <br />submit for this outfall ... 007X and 07Y -X (use 07Y -X if there is a statistical difference and use 007X if there is no stat dill). <br />We have the data for this report and are prepared to report on this outfall. However, since the DMRs are changing for <br />this outfall, do you want us to delay submitting until the new DMRs are issued? <br />2) Even if we do not submit the DMRs for WET testing on Outfalls 007 and 013, do you want us to submit the summary <br />results pages from the analytical reports and the Chains of Custody that we typically submit? <br />Once I have this answer, I can accept that we have received this formal notification. <br />Thanks, Chantell <br />Chanteli R. Johnson • - <br />