My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-02-01_REVISION - M1982131
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982131
>
2013-02-01_REVISION - M1982131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:51:39 PM
Creation date
2/1/2013 2:57:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982131
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/1/2013
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO TR-01 SECOND ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
APPLEGATE GROUP
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR1
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Date: November 29, 2012 <br />Revised January 29, 2013 <br />To: File <br />Applegate <br />Groupo.. <br />Water Resource Advisors for the West <br />Memorandum <br />From: Carrie R. Herbolsheimer, PE <br />Subject: Bucklen Equipment Company Pit Area A - Slope Stability Calculations <br />AG Job No.: 07 -148 <br />Slope stability analyses were performed for the Bucklen Equipment Company Pit, Area A. The analyses were <br />on two different conditions, one for the mining condition, during which slopes were excavated at a 1H:1V <br />grade, and one for the reclamation condition, during which the embankment backfill will be placed at no <br />steeper than a 3H:1V grade. The calculations were performed using the XSTABL slope stability software. <br />The following soil parameters were used for the project, and are based on values provided by the DRMS in <br />their review of the 11/29/12 slope stability analysis. Applegate Group does not feel that the assumption of 0 <br />psf effective cohesion is reasonable for undisturbed alluvial sand and gravel deposits. We have attached two <br />documents which calculate cohesion in such formations. <br />The first document, by Mohamad, et. al. finds a relationship between the water content of the alluvial <br />material and its water content. The lowest cohesive strength was found in saturated material at 9.5 kPa, or <br />199.4 psf. In the mined condition prior to reclamation and filling the reservoir this is a conservative value <br />since the groundwater has been drawn down for dewatering operations of the reservoir. It is more likely <br />that the sand and gravel will be in a dry condition, with a cohesive strength of 21.0 kPa, or 439.5 psf. <br />The second document, by William Gates of Jacobs Associates back calculates the cohesive strength of alluvial <br />deposits based on field observations of stable slopes. Their findings indicated an angle of internal friction <br />between 25 and 35 and cohesive strengths ranging from 200 to 500 psf. <br />Based on these findings, we submit that a cohesive strength of 55 psf is reasonable and conservative. <br />We believe that this is an appropriate assumption also based on the fact that there are many sand and <br />gravel pits in the Platte River Valley with almost vertical highwalls which have stood for many years. If a <br />slope stability model were applied to these existing pits using the numbers that DRMS proposes, the model <br />would show that they have a safety factor less than one and these slopes should have failed. Based on the <br />field evidence that these slopes have remained stable for many years during mining, it is reasonable to <br />assume that there is adequate cohesion to keep these vertical highwalls standing, and that the alluvial sand <br />and gravel in the Platte River Valley are weakly cemented, similar to the studies referenced above. <br />The USDA Web Soil Survey website was used to create a custom soil report for the site. A copy of this survey <br />is included as an attachment to this document. <br />Page 1 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.