Laserfiche WebLink
Tenmile Drainage <br />Ground Water Pathways <br />Tenmile Drainage <br />This technical attachment provides an assessment of the ground water pathways in the <br />Tenmile drainage below Mayflower Tailing Pond. This assessment was conducted to <br />evaluate whether the existing ground water monitoring wells, GWM -1 and GWM -2 are <br />positioned to intercept potential seepage from the Mayflower Tailing Pond. <br />A cross - section through the Tenmile drainage is presented in Figure 1. This figure <br />shows the location of the Tenmile Tailing and Mayflower Tailing Impoundments, the <br />geologic formations and units which underlay the tailing ponds, local structural <br />geology, and the location of monitoring wells GWM -1 and GWM -2. <br />As shown in Figure 1, GWM -1 and GWM -2 are located approximately 2,500 to 6,000 <br />feet, respectively, downgradient of the Mayflower Tailing Impoundment. Both wells <br />were completed in the alluvium. The headwater of Tenmile Creek begins below the <br />Mayflower Tailing Impoundment (5 -Dam), at Outfall 001 after the Climax Treatment <br />discharge combines with surface water from interceptor ditches. Both GWM -1 and <br />GWM -2 are located adjacent to Tenmile Creek. <br />Ground Water Pathways <br />Ground water pathways within the Tenmile drainage will be governed by the hydraulic <br />properties and continuity of the hydrostratigraphic units in which flow is occurring. <br />As shown in Figure 1, the Mayflower Tailing Impoundment is primarily sited on <br />alluvial deposits within the Tenmile drainage. The alluvial materials consist of coarse <br />sands, cobbles, and gravels. A limited portion of the tailing pond is also sited on the <br />Minturn Formation. The Mayflower starter dam was constructed of coarse tails <br />founded directly on the alluvial deposits within the drainage. Toe drains were <br />incorporated in the design to enhance tailing drainage and dam stability. <br />Based on the construction of the Mayflower Tailing Impoundment, ground water <br />which may exit the pond would either directly enter the alluvium and /or the Minturn <br />Formation. Field data of in -situ permeability tests conducted in the alluvium <br />(Appendix A) shows the hydraulic conductivity for these materials ranges from 8.5 x <br />10 to 2.5 x 10 centimeters per second (cm/sec). Packer pressure tests conducted in <br />the Minturn Formation (Appendix A) indicate a hydraulic conductivity ranging from <br />5.7 x 10" cm/sec to being impermeable at depth. Therefore, at a minimum, the <br />Minturn Formation is one- to two - orders of magnitude less permeable than the <br />alluvium. At depth, the Minturn Formation is considerably less permeable than the <br />alluvium. <br />