My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995-10-02_REVISION - M1977493 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1995-10-02_REVISION - M1977493 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:28:18 PM
Creation date
1/31/2013 6:59:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/2/1995
Doc Name
Submittal
From
Climax
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ground water conditions during the driving of the Phillipson Tunnel are presented in Table 1 <br />of Appendix A. <br />A common method of evaluating tunnel inflow data is to plot the data as inflow- per -unit- <br />length -of- tunnel versus tunnel length. This method provides insight into the change of inflow <br />as the tunnel is advanced and whether the ground is becoming more or less productive. The <br />inflow data presented in Table 1 of Appendix A were plotted as inflow -per- unit - length -of- <br />tunnel versus tunnel length, and are presented in Figure 1 of Appendix A. This figure shows <br />that as the tunnel was driven, the inflow per unit length increased markedly as the Mosquito <br />Fault was intercepted. The increase in flow per unit length reflects the interception and <br />drainage of new water - bearing fractures. Figure 1 of Appendix A also shows that after the <br />initial increase of inflow, there is a general trend of decreasing inflow per unit length as fewer <br />water bearing fractures were being intercepted and previously intercepted fractures were being <br />drained. <br />The ground water inflow data from the Phillipson Tunnel show that the tunnel penetrated an <br />extremely permeable zone that was hydraulically separated from the rocks to the west. <br />Domenico and Schwartz (1990) discuss this phenomenon of tunnel construction where "such <br />inflows are frequently associated with gouge - containing fault zones. The low - permeability <br />gouge can act as a dam for perched water so that the removal of the gouge during construction <br />can cause the inflows." The records from the Phillipson Tunnel indicate the Mosquito Fault <br />zone acts as a low permeability barrier which controls east -west migration of ground water. If <br />the Mosquito Fault were permeable, greater amounts of ground water inflow would have been <br />observed in the Phillipson Tunnel prior to intercepting the Mosquito Fault. <br />Exploratory Water Supply Well <br />A record of recent ground water conditions in the Paleozoic bedrock west of the fault can be <br />obtained from the drilling log for an exploratory water supply well drilled at the Climax Mine <br />during November, 1994. The well log and additional data are presented in Appendix B. This <br />well, located north of the main gate, was originally drilled to provide a source of domestic <br />water to the mine. However, after drilling a total of 590 feet in depth, the well did not <br />encounter any significant ground water resources. The well yield was found to be less than 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.