My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-01-29_INSPECTION - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2001-01-29_INSPECTION - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2021 3:54:55 PM
Creation date
1/31/2013 6:59:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
1/29/2001
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DMG
To
Climax
Inspection Date
9/26/2000
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M- 1977 -493 PAGE: 2 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 9 -26 -00 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: ACS <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was conducted in response to the Operator's request for surety <br />reduction based on completion of reclamation tasks required under the approved <br />reclamation plan for the Climax mine. The surety reduction request was submitted by <br />Climax in accordance with Rule 4.13 of the Hard Rock /Metal Mining Rules and <br />Regulations of the Mined Land Reclamation Board and is being processed by the Division <br />of Minerals and Geology (DMG) as revision SR -03 to Permit No. M -1977 -493. For <br />clarification, the previous surety reduction revisions for this permit, numbered SR -01 <br />and SR -02, are described here: <br />Revision SR -01: Removal of Clinton Reservoir from the reclamation permit area, <br />approved October 5, 1992. <br />Revision SR -02: Conditional acceptance that the approved post- mining land use of <br />developed water resources had been achieved for Eagle Park Reservoir, conditional <br />approval issued August 26, 1998. <br />Please note that revision SR -01 was not associated with permit amendment AM -02 (the <br />1989 amendment) and that SR -02 was likewise not associated with amendment AM -03, as <br />was suggested in the SR -03 application from Climax. <br />The 7 -shaft location was inspected. This is a ventilation shaft that is located at <br />the northeast perimeter of the Storke Complex and just below the Leadville, Colorado <br />and Southern Railroad grade. The Fan House and Compressor Buildings have been <br />demolished and removed. Foundation reclamation is in progress and has included <br />concrete drilling and blasting. The foundations and elevated concrete structures such <br />as equipment pedestals and stem walls will be managed for reclamation through <br />combinations of rubblization, removal, backfilling into cuts and burial either in <br />place or in other suitable locations. The 7 -shaft opening was sealed in 1996. <br />7 -shaft is a circular 28 -foot diameter concrete lined opening. The shaft seal design <br />is for a cast -in -place concrete slab. The design includes bottom forms for the slab <br />that are bridge decking supported by wide flange beams on 4 foot centers. The cast - <br />in -place slab was designed in general accordance with concrete slab designation "I" <br />described on Standard Drawing No. 3 in "General Bid Specifications," Colorado Inactive <br />Mine Reclamation Program (IMP), 1996. This slab design is suitable for spans up to <br />24 feet with up to 12 feet of fill thickness placed over the finished slab. Since <br />the 7 -shaft span is 28 feet, no more than four feet of cover fill may be placed on <br />the finished slab in accordance with the IMP specification. Four feet maximum cover <br />fill will be made one condition of the DMG's acceptance of the slab that has been <br />installed. Apparently, and as reported by Climax, the compressive strength of the <br />cast -in -place concrete in the slab has never been tested. 4,000 psi concrete was <br />specified. The 7 -shaft design also deviated from the IMP specifications where the <br />two central wide flange beams extend slightly more than one foot onto the shaft collar <br />concrete rather than the specified two -foot minimum. The 7 -shaft design exceeded IMP <br />specifications for slab designation "I" where a 22 inch slab thickness was employed <br />compared to the 20 inch thickness that is specified and where the edges of the slab <br />are doweled into the concrete shaft collar using 5 foot long #11 bars. <br />The DMG cannot accept the 7 -shaft closure as a completed reclamation task for the <br />purpose of determining the bond amount until the following listed items are addressed: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.