My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-25_REPORT - M1992069
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1992069
>
2013-01-25_REPORT - M1992069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:23 PM
Creation date
1/28/2013 3:42:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992069
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
1/25/2013
Doc Name
ANNUAL FEE/REPORT
From
OPERATOR
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 Requirements <br />Special Condition G of the originally issued permit stated that the "wetlands must be <br />determined to be viable and self - sustaining by the Corps of Engineers" and that "the criteria <br />for success is the dominance of native herbaceous wetland species ". Although this language <br />does not appear in Condition G as changed in the permit amendment, this is the basis upon <br />which compensatory mitigation for this project is being evaluated to determine success. <br />Evaluations of completed mitigation areas appear in Appendix 1, Evaluation of Wetlands, by <br />Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, dated January 17, 2012. <br />3.0 Summary Data <br />Summary data and photos are included in Appendix 1. <br />4.0 Maps <br />Figure 2 of Appendix 1 shows the location of the project site and the final constructed <br />compensatory wetland mitigation areas, upland and pond areas. <br />5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations <br />As noted above and in Appendix 1, the long -term effects of the June 15, 2010 flood event on <br />the developing wetlands are still unknown, particularly when coupled with additional pit <br />inundation in 2011. As flood conditions worsened again in June 2011 due to significant run- <br />off and heavy rain, City of Greeley and Boyd Freeman Ditch Co. diverted flood water from <br />the river through the ditch and into the F Street site in order to prevent further damage to the <br />F Street site as well as surrounding and downstream properties. This controlled diversion did <br />not have the severe impact of the 2010 flood but it did fill both ponds and inundated Area A <br />wetland to water levels higher than would be expected under normal conditions when <br />groundwater in the area stabilizes to pre - mining levels. <br />In early August, 2011, Boyd Freeman Ditch Co. began pumping down the water level at the <br />site in order to allow repair of the ditch and slope damage that had occurred in 2010. This <br />work was completed early in 2012 and water levels are at or near what they were prior to the <br />2010/2011 flood events. With continued de- watering at the adjacent mining operation north <br />of this site, it is not expected that the water level will increase again until those dewatering <br />activities cease. <br />While some mitigation areas of the site have been negatively impacted by these events, it <br />appears that other areas of the site may have benefited from these flood events; however, any <br />long -term impacts or benefits not only remain uncertain but are likely to change again as pre- <br />flood conditions return due to the dewatering activities discussed above. Until the site <br />Aggregate Industries -WCR 4 <br />F Street Mine Site - 2011 Annual Report (File # 199280589) <br />■ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.