2013-01-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008

Home Browse Search

JoEllen Turner 970 - 864 -7682 p.11 allow that ever to happen again. Mr. Morgan testified that he did not know what the laws were but he knew that the State was suppose to protect him as well as his lease which the Judge ruled was BREACHED., and the JUDGE ruled that the rules and regulations were also broken and now YOU, Mr. DeJoie right along with WFC is doing it again. You cannot re -map and assume this is the way it was. San Miguel Power Property was ALWAYS historically irrigated and cropped. We raised corn, wheat, even while WFC was there, we took our combine over and COMBINED the wheat which we stockpiled on Mt Nucla and WFC sold to people for feed. We raised and harvested corn as we did this place and we put corn in bins for years at the Sunshine place and when we produced silage we BORROWED WARD BURBRIDGES silage pit and put the silage. We planted straight alfalfa and the grasses still came as they are doing now. 1 seeded the San Miguel Power Property and I planted 22 pounds to the acre of ALFALFA and 70 pounds to the acre of OATS and put up oat hay. Dirk Richards place which they illegally used TR-49 to change historically irrigated and cropped fields into DRYLAND. ILLEGAL in fact, after I even reclaimed it, I got two years of cutting, baling and stacking hay and GOOD production ., All of these places should have been designated as CROP:AND. We got two and three cuttings of hay and corn and we only used it for grazing during the winter months and fed the cows and sheep right out there. So, your analysis and your believe to be are all wrong These place should have all had their proper designation and as you can see, they are still cutting two and three cuttings every year sand pasturing their cows during the winter and nothing has changed. What has changed, is several places such as Richards, Lloyds, and Johnsons that have ALWAYS been historically irrigated and cropped have now been deceivingly put into dryland. A technical revision cannot do this, yet they did illegally and before the people even know what is happening, you have 10 days and it's a done deal. All illegal. Mr. Dejoia you do not know how to tell the truth. AS DOCUMENTED BY THE STATE, PRIME FARMLAND INVESTIGATION WAS NEVER DONE IN 15 YEARS AND NO PRIME FARMLAND INVESTIGATION WAS EVER CONDUCTED ON THE MORGAN PROPERTY. You do not have your facts and a soil survey is NOT as prime farmland investigation. it is only 116th of an investigation and NRCS NOR USDA, NOR ANYONE WAS EVER CONSULTED REGARDING THE MORGAN PROPERTY. ALL LIES AND MORE LIES. The 1992 letter of Dean Stindts , a site specific letter , which was used also illegally to disqualify every piece of Barx soils in the permit. YOU HAD BETTER READ THE 2000 statement. You know nothing. They used Dean Stindts QUOTE not the 1998 soil survey by Jim Irvine. The 1998 soil survey did not even come into play until 2008. All your facts are wrong and your information is wrong!!!! AND if you would have read the 1998 soil survey MR. SOIL SCIENTIST, you would have seen that Mr. Irvine states that All of this property was prime farmland according to the National soil survey handbook which was the current issue of 1996 and if they had showed you the REAL 1998 soil survey and not their fabricated version, you would have also seen that it contained a double negative as supplied in court discovery and presented to the Judge and it said it was prime farmland. And if you would have really wanted to know, I talked to him and his wife on the phone and the one I had and was hand delivered by Ross Gubka as also presented in court, was the ONLY ONE HE WROTE FOR OUR PROPERTY AND IT WAS ALL PRIME FARMLAND. SO YOUR ENTRIES INTO THIS Pr 07 are all wrong. More lies and more distorted facts. And if you had really read the 42 1 Page