2013-01-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008

Home Browse Search

JoEllen Turner 970 -864 -7682 p.3 were not permitted at the "SIDE" meetings and this was suppose to be a scientific evaluation, but somewhere along the line these hired guns were told that ONLY 20,000 cubic yards were removed, also against the law. They also were not told that PRIME FARMLAND rules and regulations require a "PRIME FARMLAND" investigation PRIOR to mining and that the SOIL SURVEY is only 1/6th of that investigation. They were also told a false hood on the water as well as was the STATE. Mr. Morgan is and always has been the LEADING share holder of the CCC ditch and MR. Morgan OFFERED ROSS GUBKA ON TAPE RIGHT THERE AT THE KITCHEN TABLE SEVERAL TIMES TO GIVE WFC MORE WATER BUT ROSS SAID THAT LANCE DID NOT WANT TO LEASE ANY MORE WATERI!!! We felt that 50 shares would be plenty because that was ALL WE ever used as Mr. Morgan, himself testified under oath. Avalon soils, what a joke. This is for slopes Tess than 25 %. Has anyone really read our property. Our slopes were 0 tO 3 %. of course that's less than 25 %. But , the BARX soils is for slopes of Tess than 6 %. Our slopes were 0 to 3 %. What's wrong with these people? ZERO TO THREE PERCENT" And 3 -6% slopes AGAIN WHERE HAVE THEY EVER READ A PRIME FARMLAND INVESTIGATION RULE ? ?? fOR PRIME FARMLAND THE SLOPES ARE NOT 15% OR LESS OR 25% OR LESS, the slopes are less than 6 %. LESS THAN 6 %. Our slopes were 0 to 3 %. We had Barx 2E soils, not just Barx and not just PRIME FARMLAND, we had the VERY best prime farmland for this area. We ddin't have Mivida either. We are not accepting any of this. If they wanted to do a prime farmland investigation, then they should have been here in 1998. If WFC wanted to question any of these determinations made by their own soil scientist, then that needed to be done before they entered the Morgan property just like the Judge said. If they want to question NRCS and USDA reports and documentations, then they should have done those before they ever entered the property. We have USDA reports since 1960, 1960 people showing our property with BARX soils and a unanimous decision by the Board, by NRCS, and by OSM has confirmed all of this and not only once, but many documents and we are NOT ACCEPTING THIS SO CALLED IMPROVED MAPPING AND NEW MAPPING AND SOILS THAT DO NOT EVEN INDICATE WHAT WE HAVE HEREImmII Again Lewicki has NO CLUE. HE states that the average stripping for the Morgan East portion was 22 inches. What lies. What false statements. 22 inches is what they brought BACK to us that was in stockpiles EAST of 2700 road, not what was salvaged. WFC documented themselves in 2000, read the permit that the AVERAGE depth of our topsoils EXCEEDED 47 inches . They are being totally ridiculous. FIGURE the maps yours selves. What a totally ridiculous ASSUMPTION with mathematical figures and WFC own documentation already documented. Lewicki states truck shovel loaded in dump trucks. Make sense of that if you can. There is no such thing, how incompetent. This permit revision is totally unfactual, grammar problems, fragmented sentences, thrown out facts from prior permitting, false hoods, no knowledge of the rules and regulations and the SOIL SCIENTIST has NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING SURFACE COAL MINING IN COLORADO. "To prevent unnecessary contamination, adequate extent of topsoil was salvaged from the edge of a road, embankment, ditch, cut slope, and toe of fill" Where would they have possibly come up with this ? ?? 341 Page