Laserfiche WebLink
i/wig] <br />Staft <br />of <br />State.co.us Eecutive Branch Mail - Southfield Mine C1981014 Hydrology <br />Southfield Mine C1981014 Hydrology <br />Binns - DNR, Janet <janet.binns @state.co.us> Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:39 AM <br />To: Mary Rodriguez - DNR <mary.rodriguez @state.co.us >, Alysha Hernandez - DNR <br /><alys ha. hernandez @state. co. us> <br />Please scan as: <br />Southfield Mine C1981014 <br />Hydrology <br />Correspondence <br />Linda Saunders questions regarding MW -23 and MW -65 <br />Thank you <br />Janet and Dr Corley, <br />Can you tell me or calculate the distance Well 23 is from the well at 350'(1 think it is Well 65)on your property <br />that EF is testing? <br />Thank you. <br />If you read the regulations for water quality and quantity 4.05. 1 (1)and(2).120(2)(J)(II)A In no case shall Federal or <br />state water quality statutes, standards shall be violated. <br />And it states in permit area and adjacent areas. <br />(a)III Ground Water states that ground water standards at established points of compliance at one of more points <br />of compliance may be established with additional monitoring point affected area and point of compliance shall to <br />allow timely detection and remediation of contaminated areas which may result in exceedance at the point of <br />compliance. <br />(c)measurements from a sufficient number of wells on other ground water sources as approved by the Division. <br />In our July 29th letter we requested another monitoring well. <br />The regulations require the person who conducted the underground mining (EF) must notify the Division and must <br />take appropriate mitigation measures as required by 2.05.6(3)(b)(i) and (ii). The person who conduced the mining <br />must notify any person whose health and safety in in imminent danger as a result of exceeding the standards <br />and additional hydrological tests including drilling, infiltration and aquifer isolating the aquifer of interest and <br />accuracy of monitoring data collected. <br />The Newlin Creek development has a new well and it needs to be determined if that aquifer has been <br />contaminated as well. <br />What is the status of the Divisions research into this matter since July 29th and when can we expect a reply <br />regarding remediation of the contamination. <br />The Department of Natural resources is lobbying legislators for additional legislation to protect ground water. We <br />would like the regulations that exist for mining to be followed so the aquifers are protected now. <br />https: / /mail.g oog le.conVmai I /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &�iev�-- pt &search =i nboy&th= 13c635805836d2Df 1/2 <br />