My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1981033
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981033
>
2013-01-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1981033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:14 PM
Creation date
1/22/2013 1:32:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/22/2013
Doc Name
Notice of Proposed Amount of Civil Penalty Request for Conference
From
DRMS
To
Bear Coal Company, Inc
Violation No.
CV2012009
Email Name
SLB
SB1
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fault [Rule 5.04.5(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1500. <br />Assessments of "unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were the result of "negligence" may range from $250 to $750. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 to $1500. <br />The permittee, in a letter dated 12/27/11, informed DRMS of the permittee's intent to not renew <br />its DRMS permit. The permittee subsequently did not file an application for permit renewal, thus <br />ensuring its DRMS permit would expire. The permittee had not completed its required <br />reclamation at the time of permit expiration. This demonstrates a very high level of intentional <br />conduct. <br />The Fault component is therefore proposed to be set at $1500. <br />Good Faith in Achieving Compliance [Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />The permittee did not abate this violation by the required abatement date. <br />A reduction for Good Faith Credit is not proposed. <br />Number of Days [Rule 5.04.6]: <br />The Division may assess a separate civil penalty for each day from the date of issuance of the <br />notice of violation or cessation order to the date fixed for abatement of a violation. In <br />determining whether to make such an assessment, the Division may consider the extent to which <br />the person to whom the notice or order was issued gained any economic benefit as a result of a <br />failure to comply. <br />Bear Coal Company gained an economic benefit from not incurring the cost of conducting its <br />required reclamation and from not achieving Phase III bond release before expiration of the <br />DRMS permit. The Division therefore believes an assessment of a separate civil penalty for each <br />day from the date of issuance of the notice of violation to the date fixed for abatement of the <br />violation should be made. The Notice of Violation was issued on 12/17/12. The NOV abatement <br />date was fixed at 12/31/12. <br />The Number of Days is therefore proposed at 14. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore set at $42,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.