Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety <br />January 3, 2013 <br />Page 4 <br />axiomatic that WFC, if it wishes to enjoy the benefits of a renewed mining permit, must assure <br />that its outstanding legal obligations are satisfied. The judgment of the District Court here is a <br />fact which cannot be dismissed or disregarded in the review of the instant application. <br />Moreover, it is plainly within the power of WFC to come into compliance with the law by <br />satisfying the judgment as a condition precedent to the renewal of its permit. <br />Accordingly, the Morgans request that renewal of the permit here be denied or, in the <br />alternative, that the renewal decision be conditioned upon WFC taking immediate steps to satisfy <br />the judgment in Case Number 2010 CV 367 in full. <br />Sin rely, <br />istoph r G. cAnany <br />Enclosures <br />xc: Jeff Fugate <br />Chris Kamper <br />Clients <br />