My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-12-27_REPORT - M1980244 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-12-27_REPORT - M1980244 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:11:41 PM
Creation date
1/10/2013 9:54:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
12/27/2012
Doc Name
QA Monitoring and Test Results- LOB Liner Extension- Cover to Append. G.1
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�i <br />Ah <br />L� <br />6.2.6 Non - Destructive Testing <br />Lonestar performed non - destructive seam testing on completed seams and geomembrane <br />repairs. Non - destructive testing for seams included pressure testing of fusion - welded seams, <br />and vacuum testing of extrusion welded seams and repairs. AMEC monitored and documented <br />the non - destructive testing. <br />Prior to pressure testing of fusion seams, Lonestar heat - sealed both ends of the air channel <br />between the two tracks of the double wedge weld. Lonestar then inserted a pressure gauge in <br />one end of the sealed channel. Lonestar pressurized the air channel to approximately <br />30 pounds per square inch (psi) using an air pump. After pressure stabilization, AMEC <br />monitored the gauge for a minimum of five minutes. The maximum allowable pressure drop <br />was 3 psi. <br />Lonestar and AMEC verified fusion seam continuity before heat - sealing both seam ends, <br />completed pressure testing, and with the gauge left in place, cut the opposite end of the seam. <br />If the gauge pressure dropped to zero, the seam was determined to be continuous. In cases <br />where the seam was found to be discontinuous, the seam was subdivided into shorter sections <br />until continuous seam sections were located and passing pressure tests were performed, or the <br />outer edge of the seam was extrusion welded and vacuum tested. <br />If a pressure test failed, Lonestar checked the seam section for leakage, and repaired and <br />re- tested the seam. If Lonestar was unable to find the leak, the seam was divided into two <br />sections, with each section being tested to locate the area of concern. This subdivision process <br />was repeated until the leak location was identified. If the leak area was not located, Lonestar <br />reconstructed the seam, and then vacuum tested the repair. <br />Lonestar tested extrusion welded sections with a vacuum box. Prior to vacuum box testing, <br />Lonestar applied a soap and water solution to the welded section. The vacuum box was then <br />placed over the seam area and energized with a vacuum pump capable of creating a vacuum of <br />not less than 5 psi. Lonestar and AMEC observed the action of the vacuum on the weld for a <br />minimum of ten seconds. Each consecutively tested weld length was overlapped a minimum of <br />3 inches. If soap bubbles appeared, AMEC marked and documented the leak location. <br />Lonestar then repaired the leak and vacuum tested the repair. This procedure was used to test <br />extrusion repairs and extrusion patches. <br />The seam non - destructive test summaries (fusion pressure tests and extrusion vacuum tests) <br />for the geomembrane are presented in Appendix G -6. <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.