2012-12-17_REVISION - M2004030

• Permit No: M2004030
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 12/17/2012
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review-02 Response
• From: T Bone Stone, Inc.
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: CN1
• Email Name: MAC
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

L o , 4 �i',
/ /7_/ ./
The Operator's new responses to the below comments are in this red font to facilitate your
review. The Operator's original initial responses are shown in this blue font.
October 2, 2012
William H. Tenore
T Bone Stone, Inc.
2337 Emery Street
Longmont, CO 80503
RE: T Bone Stone Quarry; DRMS File No. M- 2004 -030; 112 Construction Materials 1
Permit Conversion Application; Adequacy Review —02 — R n 0
Dear Mr. Tenore,
"
John W. Hickenlooper
Governor
Mike King
Executive Director
Loretta E. Pineda
Director
The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has completed its preliminary adequacy review
of your 112 Construction Materials Reclamation Permit Application. The application was
received on July 30, 2012 and called complete for review on August 23, 2012. The Decision
date for this application is November 21, 2012. Please be advised that if you are unable to
satisfactorily address any concerns identified in this review before the decision date, it will
be your responsibility to request an extension of the review period. If there are outstanding
issues that have not been adequately addressed prior to the end of the review period, and
no extension has been requested, the Division will deny this application.
The review consisted of comparing the application content with specific requirements of
Rule 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, and 6.5 of the Mineral Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land
Reclamation Board for the Extraction of Construction Materials. In general the application was
substantially adequate; however, as with most applications there are a few items that will require
the submittal of additional information or clarification of the existing information. Inadequacies
are identified under the respective exhibit heading along with suggested actions to correct them.
1. The Division received comments from the Colorado Historical Society, Colorado Division
of Water Resources and Army Corps of Engineers. The letters are attached for your review.
Please address the comments noted in the letters, and make any changes in the application as
necessary.
2. If a State of Colorado Non -Point Source Stormwater Discharge Permit is deemed to be
required, Operator will obtain any necessary permits and comply with the requirements
therein. There is no stream system on the site. No stormwater runoff interception occurs on
the site. Water used on the site is purchased by the Operator and transported to the site in a
400 - gallon tank. The water is for employees and is not used in quarry operations.
6.4.1 Exhibit A — Legal Description
No comment.
6.4.2 Exhibit B — Index Map