Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jared Dains, E.I. <br />Loloff SWSP <br />December 31, 2012 <br />Page3of5 <br />(0.25% per mile) river transit Toss will be assessed on all deliveries. During the winter it is possible <br />for a call to be placed on the Evans Number 2 ditch for a Milton Reservoir call, or a call at the <br />Western, either of which could potentially sweep the river. It is the Applicants responsibility to track <br />the daily call and make arrangements as necessary to ensure this water is bypassed or otherwise <br />delivered to the Cache la Poudre and South Platte River confluence. The District 3 Water <br />Commissioner has confirmed there is no call in the winter for the stretch of the Cache la Poudre <br />River between the Loloff Pit and the confluence with the South Platter River. Therefore as long as <br />the South Platte River does not sweep, the Aurora lease is able to provide replacement water on <br />behalf of the Loloff Pit. <br />The Applicant has also obtained a lease from the Graham Drainage Ditch Company for <br />41.9 acre -feet of fully consumable water from the Graham Seepage & Drainage Canal water right <br />(WDID 0301321). This water right was decreed in case no. W -7818 as developed water, not <br />tributary to the South Platte River. The Court found that 2,800 acre -feet of water was developed by <br />the construction, development, and operation of the Graham Seepage & Drainage Canal; however, <br />historically, only 1,330 acre -feet were consumptively used, with 1,470 acre -feet discharged as <br />waste water to the Cache La Poudre River and its tributaries. In the decree entered in case no. <br />W -7818, the Court indicated that it considered the Supreme Court decisions in the cases of <br />Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District et al. v. Shelton Farms and Southeastern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Colorado -New Mexico Land Co., Inc. 187 Colo. 181, 529 <br />P.2d 13212 (1974). Based on the above, this SWSP will only recognize 1,330 acre -feet per year of <br />consumable water. The lease for the Graham Seepage & Drainage Canal water signed on <br />November 8, 2012 and will provide fully consumable water for the period of April 2013 through <br />October 2013 and a copy of the lease is attached to this letter. The fully consumable portion of the <br />water delivered is determined by multiplying measured deliveries by 47.5 %. The lease amounts <br />are for fully consumable water, therefore actual deliveries will include additional water to account <br />for the 47.5% factor. The Graham Seep Ditch deliveries are made approximately 4.3 river miles <br />upstream of the estimated point of depletion of the Loloff Pit, therefore a 0.25% per mile transit loss <br />results in 41.45 acre -feet of water available for augmentation. The lease amount is sufficient to <br />cover all depletions during the April through October 2013 timeframe. <br />Conditions of Approval <br />I approve the proposed substitute water supply plan in accordance with Section 37 -90- <br />137(11), C.R.S., subject to the following conditions: <br />1. This SWSP shall be valid for the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, <br />unless otherwise revoked, modified, or superseded by decree. If this plan will not be <br />made absolute by a water court action by the plan's expiration date, a renewal request <br />must be submitted to this office with the statutory fee (currently $257) no later than <br />November 15, 2013. <br />2. A well permit was obtained for the current use and exposed pond surface area of the <br />gravel pit in accordance with §37 -90- 137(2) and (11), C.R.S., permit no. 74793 -F. <br />3. The total surface area of the groundwater exposed at the site must not exceed 20.2 <br />acres, or result in an evaporative loss at the Loloff Pit greater than 54.36 acre -feet in <br />2013. <br />4. The annual amount of water used at the Loloff Pit for dust control shall not exceed 1.00 <br />acre -feet and total product mined at the site shall not exceed 55,000 tons resulting 1.62 <br />acre -feet of water lost with the mined aggregate. <br />