Laserfiche WebLink
Notes: <br />(1) Equal to the exposed post -1981 surface area around the perimeter of the east side of the site <br />(2) Total gross evaporation (40 0 inches) is based upon NOAA Technical Report NWS 33 and distributed according to SEO Senate Bill 89 -120 criteria <br />November 4,00% February 3 50% May 12 00°6 August 13 50% <br />December 3 00% March 5 50% June 14 50% September 10 00% <br />January 3 00% April 9 00% .tuly 15 00% October 7 00% <br />(3) Average precipitation values calculated from the entire period of record (1983 -2004) of Longmont 2 NOAA station <br />(4) Assumed 70% effective precipitation <br />(5) Equal to (2) - (4) <br />(6) Equal to (1) x (5) <br />(7) Evaporative depletions in (6) lagged using the Glover methodology in the IDS AWAS model using the parameters below <br />Transmissivity 35,000 gallons /day /foot <br />Specific Yield 0 2 <br />Aquifer Width 8,800 feet <br />Distance from center of Duckworth property to nver 4,400 feet <br />(8) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Matenals (MMM) Monthly production values are estimates and may vary so long as annual consumption is not <br />exceeded. <br />(9) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from MMM Water removed with crushed mined aggregate equals 2% of total mined volume and with washed mined aggregate <br />equals 4% of total mined volume as defined by Senate Bill 89 -120 Therefore, (9) is equal to the projected aggregate production (in tons), multiplied by 9 6 gallons /ton, divided by 325,851 to convert gallons to acre - <br />feet and divided by 2 if crushed <br />(10) Projected future dust suppression is based upon estimates from MMM <br />(11) Equal to (9) + (10) <br />(12) Lagging of aggregate production and dust suppression (11) based upon the factors shown in the note for (7) <br />(13) Equal to (12) + (7) <br />Table 1 <br />;Martin Marietta Materials <br />Duckworth Pi <br />2012 -2013 Projects Depletions <br />Evaporation Depletions <br />Production Depletions <br />(1) <br />(2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />(5) <br />(6) <br />(7) <br />Sal 1 (8b) <br />(9) <br />(10) <br />(11) <br />(12) <br />(13) <br />Aggregate Production <br />Total <br />Net <br />Lagged Net <br />(tons) <br />Aggregate <br />Total <br />Lagged <br />Net <br />Gross <br />Effective <br />Net <br />Evaporation <br />Evaporation <br />Production <br />Dust <br />Production <br />Production <br />Total Lagged <br />Exposed <br />Evaporation <br />Precipitation <br />Precipitation <br />Evaporation <br />Volume <br />Depletions <br />Crushed <br />Consumption <br />Suppression (ac- <br />Depletions <br />Depletions <br />Depletions <br />Month <br />Area (ac) <br />(ft) <br />(ft) <br />(ft) <br />(ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />Washed) <br />Washed <br />(ac -ft) <br />ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />Nov -12 <br />0.45 <br />0 13 <br />0 05 <br />0 04 <br />0 10 <br />0 04 <br />0 000 <br />0 <br />0 0 0 00000000 0 <br />0.00 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 000 <br />0 00 <br />Dec -12 <br />0 45 <br />0.10 <br />0.04 <br />0 03 <br />0 07 <br />0 03 <br />0 000 <br />0 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0.00 <br />0.000 <br />0 00 <br />Jan -13 <br />0 45 <br />0.10 <br />0 03 <br />0 02 <br />0 08 <br />0 04 <br />0 001 <br />0 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 000 <br />0 00 <br />Feb -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 12 <br />0 04 <br />0 03 <br />0 09 <br />0 04 <br />0 002 <br />0 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 000 <br />0 00 <br />Mar -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 18 <br />0 08 <br />0 06 <br />0 13 <br />0 06 <br />0 003 <br />90,000 <br />1 32 <br />1 90 <br />3 22 <br />0 001 <br />0 00 <br />Apr -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 30 <br />0 14 <br />0 10 <br />0 20 <br />0 09 <br />0 005 <br />45,000 <br />0 66 <br />0 92 <br />1 58 <br />0 012 <br />0 02 <br />May -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 40 <br />0 20 <br />0 14 <br />0 26 <br />0 12 <br />0 006 <br />0 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0.062 <br />0 07 <br />Jun -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 48 <br />0 14 <br />0 10 <br />0 38 <br />0 17 <br />0 009 <br />115,000 <br />1 69 <br />3.22 <br />4 91 <br />0 125 <br />0 13 <br />Jul -13 <br />045 <br />050 <br />011 <br />008 <br />042 <br />019 <br />0012 <br />0 <br />000 <br />0,00 <br />000 <br />0171 <br />018 <br />Aug -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 45 <br />0 10 <br />0 07 <br />0 38 <br />0 17 <br />0 017 <br />0 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 250 <br />0 27 <br />Sep -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 33 <br />0 10 <br />0 07 <br />0 26 <br />0 12 <br />0 022 <br />115,000 <br />1 69 <br />1 90 <br />3 59 <br />0 306 <br />0 33 <br />Oct -13 <br />0 45 <br />0 23 <br />0 08 <br />0 06 <br />0 18 <br />0 08 <br />0 027 <br />0 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 00 <br />0 326 <br />0 35 <br />Total <br />3 33 <br />1.13 <br />0 79 <br />2 55 <br />1 15 <br />0 104 <br />365,000 <br />0 <br />5 37 <br />7 94 <br />13 31 <br />1 253 <br />1 36 <br />Notes: <br />(1) Equal to the exposed post -1981 surface area around the perimeter of the east side of the site <br />(2) Total gross evaporation (40 0 inches) is based upon NOAA Technical Report NWS 33 and distributed according to SEO Senate Bill 89 -120 criteria <br />November 4,00% February 3 50% May 12 00°6 August 13 50% <br />December 3 00% March 5 50% June 14 50% September 10 00% <br />January 3 00% April 9 00% .tuly 15 00% October 7 00% <br />(3) Average precipitation values calculated from the entire period of record (1983 -2004) of Longmont 2 NOAA station <br />(4) Assumed 70% effective precipitation <br />(5) Equal to (2) - (4) <br />(6) Equal to (1) x (5) <br />(7) Evaporative depletions in (6) lagged using the Glover methodology in the IDS AWAS model using the parameters below <br />Transmissivity 35,000 gallons /day /foot <br />Specific Yield 0 2 <br />Aquifer Width 8,800 feet <br />Distance from center of Duckworth property to nver 4,400 feet <br />(8) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Matenals (MMM) Monthly production values are estimates and may vary so long as annual consumption is not <br />exceeded. <br />(9) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from MMM Water removed with crushed mined aggregate equals 2% of total mined volume and with washed mined aggregate <br />equals 4% of total mined volume as defined by Senate Bill 89 -120 Therefore, (9) is equal to the projected aggregate production (in tons), multiplied by 9 6 gallons /ton, divided by 325,851 to convert gallons to acre - <br />feet and divided by 2 if crushed <br />(10) Projected future dust suppression is based upon estimates from MMM <br />(11) Equal to (9) + (10) <br />(12) Lagging of aggregate production and dust suppression (11) based upon the factors shown in the note for (7) <br />(13) Equal to (12) + (7) <br />Table 1 <br />;Martin Marietta Materials <br />Duckworth Pi <br />2012 -2013 Projects Depletions <br />