My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-12-26_HYDROLOGY - M2003091
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2003091
>
2012-12-26_HYDROLOGY - M2003091
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:11:39 PM
Creation date
12/27/2012 10:08:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003091
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
12/26/2012
Doc Name
SWSP
From
OSE
To
Bishop-Brogden Associates
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Heintz & Ms. Wynne <br />Duckworth SWSP <br />December 24, 2012 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />dewatered state. Pursuant to paragraph 13 of the General Guidelines for Substitute Water <br />Supply Plans for Sand and Gravel Pit (April 2, 2011), a 2% moisture content by weight is <br />charged as a ground water diversion. Therefore, 5.37 acre -feet of water is expected to be <br />consumed from the aggregate production during this approval period. <br />The Alluvial Water Accounting System ( "AWAS ") model was used with the alluvial <br />aquifer boundary condition option to lag depletions to Boulder Creek. The following parameters <br />were used in the model: transmissivity (T) = 35,000 gallons per day per foot, distance (X) from <br />the centroid of the surface of the exposed ground water to the river = 4,400 feet, distance (W) <br />from the aquifer boundary through the exposed ground water to the river channel = 8,800 feet, <br />and specific yield (SY) = 0.2. The location of the stream depletion is assumed to be <br />perpendicular to the river. The lagged depletions due to evaporation and mining operations <br />SWSP period are shown in Table 1 and are estimated to total 1.36 acre -feet during this <br />approval period. <br />Dewatering <br />The Applicant will dewater the site to allow for dry mining operations using collection <br />ditches that will surround the pit. This water will either be pumped to the Lighthouse Cove Pond <br />to the north, or be pumped to the Smith and Emmons Ditch to be transported back to Boulder <br />Creek. Dewatering water may also be used as part of the dust control operations which is <br />considered 100% consumptive use. Dewatering shall be metered so as to account for water <br />delivered to Lighthouse Cove Pond, the Smith and Emmons Ditch, or to dust control operations. <br />The Lighthouse Cove Pond ( "LCP ") is an unlined ground water pond (well) owned by the <br />Lighthouse Cove Development. This pond was created from sand and gravel operations under <br />DRMS permit no. M- 1983 -099 and was known as the Groom Addition. DRMS released this pit <br />in 1993. A pre -1989 augmentation agreement between the gravel pit operator and the District 6 <br />Water Users Association provides for replacement of evaporation from the LCP. Given the size <br />of the pond and the rate of dewatering, the dewatering operation is not expected to increase the <br />exposed surface area of the pond by any measureable amount. The LCP is approximately the <br />same distance from Boulder Creek as is the Duckworth site and therefore any lagged depletions <br />associated with dewatering that is discharged into the LCP is assumed to be offset by the <br />lagged recharge credits generated by the same operation. This SWSP does not confer on <br />Applicant the right to use facilities or structures not owned by it. MMM has stated they are in the <br />process of obtaining permission from Lighthouse Cove Development to use their pond and they <br />shall not divert any water to that pond until the appropriate legal arrangements are made. Any <br />dewatering water placed into LCP cannot be used for irrigation or any other purpose by <br />Lighthouse Cove Development or others, and must be allowed to accrete to the stream. The <br />provision in the SWSP allowing LCP to be used as a recharge pond may not be <br />continued in SWSP renewals should it be determined by the water commissioner or <br />division engineer that water within LCP is being diverted for use and accounting is not <br />adequate to show the recharge of dewatering is occurring. <br />MMM has obtained permission from the Smith and Emmons Ditch Company to run <br />dewatering water in the ditch and plans to construct a waste way for the Smith and Emmons <br />Ditch which will run from the ditch due west and directly back into Boulder Creek. This structure <br />and its measurement device must be in place and approved by the water commissioner prior to <br />any credit from dewatering is given to water placed into the Smith and Emmons Ditch unless the <br />MMM or the ditch company can show to the satisfaction of the water commissioner that an <br />alternate route was provided to deliver the dewatering water to Boulder Creek. Discharging the <br />dewatering operation to Boulder Creek will create an instant dewatering credit and a lagged <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.