Laserfiche WebLink
Month <br />( <br />Historic <br />Ditch <br />Diversion <br />(ac -ft) <br />(2) <br />Historic <br />Farm <br />Delivery <br />(ac -ft) <br />( <br />Historic <br />On -Site <br />Depletions <br />(ac -ft) <br />Total <br />Nor <br />Return <br />( <br />( <br />Surface <br />Runoff <br />(ac -fl) <br />( <br />To <br />Ground <br />Water <br />(ac -ft) <br />Glover <br />Lagging <br />Percent <br />( <br />Lagged <br />Ground Water <br />Return Flow <br />is -ft) <br />Total <br />Return <br />Flows <br />(10) <br />stream <br />Depletion <br />Credits <br />(ac -ft) <br />January <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />�p [� cn cn --! \p c0 <br />N .-- p ccn l� �Y Q■ O <br />N cn .--1 1 <br />February <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />4.43% <br />2.1 <br />March <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />3.38% <br />1.6 <br />April <br />1.2 <br />0.9 <br />0.6 <br />0.3 <br />0.2 <br />3.17% <br />1.6 <br />May <br />23.5 <br />18.8 <br />10.2 <br />8.5 <br />5.6 <br />4.75% <br />5.3 <br />June <br />48.7 <br />38.9 <br />21.3 <br />17.6 <br />11.5 <br />11.47% <br />11.6 <br />July <br />63.9 <br />51.1 <br />28.0 <br />23.1 <br />co <br />15.0 <br />18.25% <br />h <br />00 <br />16.8 <br />August <br />41.1 <br />32.9 <br />18.7 <br />14.2 <br />9.2 <br />18.67% <br />13.8 <br />September <br />20.0 <br />16.0 <br />8.7 <br />7.3 <br />4.8 <br />14.20% <br />9.3 <br />October <br />5.8 <br />4.6 <br />2.5 <br />2.1 <br />1.4 <br />9.34% <br />5.2 <br />November <br />0.2 <br />0.1 <br />0.1 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />5.66% <br />2.7 <br />December <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />3.78% <br />1.8 <br />Total <br />204.2 <br />163.4 <br />90.1 <br />73.3 <br />25.6 <br />47.6 <br />100.00% <br />47.6 <br />73.3 <br />90.1 <br />Notes: <br />(1) Ditch Diversions based on 1911 - 1998 annual average, with the exception of 1933 through 1935 which were not available. (See Table 2.) <br />(2) Farm Delivery accounts for 20% ditch loss / or shrink. <br />(3) Based on average year Water Balance analysis. (See Table 6.) <br />(4) Equals (2) -(3). <br />(5) Surface Return flows are assumed to be 35 %. <br />(6) Equals column (4) -(5). <br />(7) Based on SEO Glover Analysis; T = 35,000 gpd /ft, S = 0.10, D = 1200 ft. <br />(8) Equals total of column (6) times (7). <br />(9) Equals (5) + (8). <br />(10) Equals (2) - (9); positive values represent historic depletions to the river and negative values represent historic return flows to the river. <br />BBA <br />w1rer consul..anr <br />Bl.srror .4 ff0e4.4 twr <br />TABLE 7 <br />Historic ions Attributable <br />to the Hea Property's 2 Rural Ditch Share <br />H: \9941 - Lafarge \9941.03 - Heaton Pit \Rural Ditch CU.xls <br />