Laserfiche WebLink
Degradation of ground water quality could occur in three locations. The train loadout and <br />auxiliary coal stockpile are located on an alluvial terrace of the North Fork of the Gunnison. <br />Runoff infiltration could result in the dissolution of salts. The operator installed and monitors <br />three wells downgradient from these facilities and has not detected any significant water quality <br />changes. The Division has expressed some concern about the narrow band of alluvium found <br />downdip of the underground waste development stockpile. The operator has installed a well <br />(Node 22) and is monitoring that location for impacts. No impacts have been detected to date. <br />Lastly, there is a slim probability that subsidence related impacts to springs might result in the <br />modification of the springs' water quality due to a change in routing of the water. The operator <br />is monitoring springs in currently affected areas quarterly for major cations and anions, and no <br />changes have been detected. <br />When mining was in progress, water utilized for mine operations was obtained from a well in the <br />Steven's Gulch well field. Consumption from this alluvial/ colluvial deposit was measured with <br />a wellhead gage. From July 1990 through June 1991, BRL produced 720,000 tons of coal and <br />imported approximately 18,000 gpd from the Steven's Gulch well. Water quality information is <br />also collected and reported to the Division. In 1986, CWI produced 333,292 tons of coal and <br />consumed 8,700 gpd while in operation. In 1983, the Bowie No. 1 Mine produced 1.3 million <br />tons of coal and consumed 27,400 gpd. There has not been any detectable impact to the <br />groundwater /surface water regime in this well field since they initiated pumping at the site. <br />Dewatering will occur at the Bowie No. 1 Mine but will be insignificant in extent. Mine inflows <br />may be derived from fractures associated with perched aquifers within the overlying Mesaverde, <br />surficial alluvial /colluvial sediments, and stream flows associated with fracture systems as well <br />as from dewatering of the coal aquifer itself In 1983, approximately 300,000 gallons of water <br />flowed into the mine from perched, discontinuous, water bearing sandstones overlying the D <br />seam. A Division inspection in March 1986 documented inflows of 200 gallons per day. This <br />inflow gradually slowed once this perched aquifer was completely dewatered. Inflows during <br />1991 failed to produce over 3 gpm for any significant period of time. Because the portals at the <br />Bowie No. 1 Mine were sealed in 2001 and the Bowie No. 1 West Mine portals were sealed in <br />2000, there is no current information on mine inflows. <br />BRL has established an extensive monitoring system to monitor water levels in colluvial /alluvial <br />deposits in the permit area and in the alluvium of streams overlying mine entries. Permeability <br />tests on colluvium in the East Roatcap Creek drainage averaged 7.2x102ft /day. No significant <br />water level fluctuations have been noted in conjunction with mine inflows. Mine inflows in the <br />mains underlying East Roatcap Creek averaged less than 1 gpm from 1987 to 1993. <br />The permeability of the coal aquifer was measured in 1986 at 1.4x102ft /day. This insignificant <br />aquifer has yet to make a visible contribution to mine inflows. BRL imported water for dust <br />suppression from their wells in Steven's Gulch. In 1983, for example, the operator estimated that <br />approximately 6.24 million gallons of water is consumed as moisture on the coal, 0.5 million <br />gallons is consumed through increased humidity in the ventilation air, and less than 0.5 million <br />gallons is lost through seepage into the floor of the mine. <br />C'iirfarP Water <br />The Bowie No. 1 Mine area will not significantly affect the local surface water hydrology or the <br />regional hydrology. Sediment control measures will ensure protection to stream quality. No <br />mine water will discharge from the portals and no water will be withdrawn from the creek. An <br />Page 24 of 42 <br />