Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 of 6 <br />a high pH a standard of 10 mg /I <br />would be more appropriate than <br />the .2 mg /I. In 2011 neither of the <br />Seneca II wells displayed a value <br />higher than 3.5 mg /I. The TDS <br />trend at well SBAL68 is stable and <br />do to the recent addition of well <br />SFAL72 to the monitoring <br />program, a trend cannot be <br />determined at this time. <br />19. Restoration of <br />CDRMS regulation <br />YES <br />ground recharge to <br />4.05.12(3) <br />approximate pre- mining <br />rate <br />20. Prevention of <br />CDRMS regulation <br />YES <br />Compliance with the Basic <br />adverse impacts to <br />4.05.11(1) <br />Standards for ground water, as in <br />ground water systems <br />item 10, indicates the permittee is <br />outside permit area <br />preventing adverse impacts to <br />ground water quality outside the <br />permit area. Monitoring data <br />indicate the permittee is <br />preventing impacts to water <br />quantity outside the permit area. <br />Hydrology reports indicate that a <br />water level at all wells fell within <br />their historic ranges, with the <br />exception of well SFAL72. SFAL72 <br />is new to the monitoring program <br />so long term data is not available. <br />All alluvial wells showed seasonal <br />water level fluctuations in <br />response to periods of <br />precipitation or lack thereof. <br />Overburden and coal well water <br />levels are fluctuating in response <br />to the precipitation recharge and <br />ground water flow from the <br />reclaimed mine pits. <br />21. Prevention of <br />CDRMS regulation <br />YES <br />impacts to ground <br />4.05.11(2) <br />water that adversely <br />impact post- mining land <br />use <br />22. Minimize <br />CDRMS regulation <br />YES <br />The disturbance to the hydrologic <br />disturbance to <br />4.05.1(1) <br />balance within and adjacent to the <br />hydrologic balance <br />permit area caused by mining and <br />