Laserfiche WebLink
14 ,E1IYAIISIDED & Updated COMPLAINT FROM PAUL D SCHMIT7 Hespe... <br />boundary property owners in this Process were contacted as to these Developments and there were <br />delays in notification to those of us who are informed in the Due Process effort; the <br />Public Due Process efforts were split out and therefore not informative to allow the 2013 <br />Leasing. A violation of Public Due Process, and accurate water consumption and environmental <br />Chemicals impacts seem overlooked. <br />To make this process more effective, All of the Departments involved should consider <br />the various conflicts of Interests, vis a vis Development Bonuses, lack of correct changes to <br />Tax Receipts for Minerals Removed from this region, and most importantly, the total <br />Consumptive use of surfaces waters, and sub surface aquifers. Neither of the EA's or EIS's <br />cumulatively <br />account for the draw of said waters from depleted sub surface flows, know to traditional Ranchers <br />and <br />hydro geologists in the area. Especially in the worst drought period in 700 years, and in light of the <br />USGS 50 year Forecast on Deforestation due to Drought, a few years ago. <br />Further, the relocating of the La Plata River to Cherry Creek remains suspicious to many folks, as to <br />the <br />overall flora and fauna effects to the region effects by these three arenas for proposed <br />development. <br />When one accounts for New Mining Planned up the La Plata Canyon, and on effects of 40 new <br />homes at <br />https:11 m all. google. comlmail lu /Ol ?ui= 2 &ik= 91a975f658 &v iew=pt &search = in box &th =13b9f 6d7117f 60dc 315 <br />