Laserfiche WebLink
Doug White, Western Fuels <br />C- 2010 -089 / MR -02 & TR -01 PAR <br />Dec. 17, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />condition. The unit weight used in the calculation was 115 pcf, which seems too <br />low (average constructed was 123.5 pcf). <br />5. Please review and revise the parameters used, as appropriate, and provide a <br />stability analysis for the condition described in 4.05.9(8)(b). Please also provide <br />the laboratory strength test results (direct shear strength) referenced by <br />Lambert <br />4.05.9(9) - Will embankment faces and slopes be vegetated or stabilized by other means? <br />6. Please provide a statement addressing this requirement. <br />4.05.9(10) - Is there adequate freeboard to prevent overtopping by waves or sudden increases in <br />volume? <br />7. Please provide a statement addressing this requirement. <br />4.05.9(14) - Was the impoundment inspected by qualified registered P.E. or specialist? <br />(a) Regularly inspected during construction, and upon completion of construction? <br />Lambert and Associates inspected the operation and conducted compaction tests <br />on a regular basis, and the certification has been provided. Item satisfactorily <br />addressed <br />Please submit information addressing the comments itemized above, so that the revision <br />application may be approved. You are welcome to contact me with any questions you may have. <br />Sincerely, <br />Marcia L. Talvitie, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Sandy Brown, DRMS <br />