My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982-03-18_REVISION - C1981013 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
1982-03-18_REVISION - C1981013 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2020 9:19:30 PM
Creation date
12/13/2012 10:12:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/18/1982
Doc Name
CF& Is response to Concerns
From
CF & I Steel Corporation
To
MLRB
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Maxwell Mine <br /> Purgatoire River Flow Estimations <br /> Regional Analysis Method <br /> 1 ) Yearly peak flows of gaged water stations along the <br /> Purgatoire River were obtained from the United States <br /> Geological Survey. These records , of the same river <br /> drainage in question at the Maxwell Mine , satisify the <br /> requirement that the gaged watersheds should be <br /> climatically and physically similar to the ungaged <br /> watershed at the mine . Additional data for the Ciruela <br /> Canyon drainage comes from the Soil Conservation <br /> Service to suppliment data from the USGS because of the <br /> short times of record of the Stonewall station on the <br /> Purgatoire . <br /> 2) Frequency lines for each gaged watershed were <br /> constructed numerically and the flows estimated for the <br /> 100-yr ( 3) and 50-yr (2%) return periods . The <br /> frequency lines are Cumulative Distribution Curves of a <br /> log-normal plot of the probility vs . flow. The <br /> flow is then approximated from the curve for the <br /> desired return frequencies for each gaged watershed . <br /> 3) The Peak Flow vs. Watershed Area for a given return <br /> period , as calculated above , is then fit to a log curve <br /> by a least squares fit method . <br /> 4) These curves then predict the expected flow for any <br /> watershed of a given area for the desired return' <br /> period . Only the 100-yr and the 50-yr return periods <br /> were calculated therefore a frequency plot of the <br /> Maxwell (design) watershed was not constructed . <br /> 5) Because the State Highway Department estimates <br /> predicted a lower flow ( 13 ,000 cfs vs . 15 ,700 cfs) <br /> further error estimates were felt to be unnecessary as <br /> the high value would provide for a certain margin of <br /> safety. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.