Laserfiche WebLink
21 <br /> immediately above and below the coal seam. The lithology of the strata <br /> exposed in the open holes is described on the data sheets in Tables Bl and <br /> B2 in Appendix B. The geophysical logs of these intervals are in the map <br /> pocket. The transmissivities determined in the tests represent weighted <br /> mean values for the open intervals. Strata immediately above and below <br /> the coal seam were purposely included in the test interval so that we could <br /> assess the potential mine inflows from adjacent roof and floor rocks should <br /> fracturing of these strata occur during mining. <br /> Well LA 264 was designed to provide an assessment of the water bearing <br /> capacity of the overburden in addition to that provided by the core per- <br /> meability tests. The completion details for this well are included on the <br /> test data sheet in Appendix B, Table B3, and the geophysical log is in the <br /> map pocket. Note that the open interval in LA 264 extends from a depth of <br /> 62 ft. to 276 ft. During drilling, water inflow was encountered at about <br /> 72 ft. and estimated to be about 15 gpm. No significant increase in dis- <br /> charge was observed over the remainder of the hole. Examination of drill <br /> cuttings and the geophysical logs indicate that the water encountered at <br /> 72 ft. was produced from a thin layer of siltstone. The gamma-gamma log <br /> indicates a washout (hole enlargement) beginning at 72 ft. and extending <br /> to perhaps 74 ft. It is probable that a thin fractured zone at this level <br /> accounts for essentially all of produced water. The "aquifer" test con- <br /> ducted at LA 264 consisted of pumping at a constant rate for more than two <br /> hours and the analysis of the drawdown data was accomplished using the <br /> standard Jacob Method (McWhorter and Sunada, 1977) as shown in Figure 5. <br /> The hydraulic properties determined from these tests are summarized <br /> in Table 2. Even the largest of the transmissivities in Table 2 is small <br /> relative to values required for most water supply purposes. The average <br /> } permeabilities K are very small and are indicative of very poor water pro- <br /> ducing capabilities. The values of K shown in the right-hand column were <br /> obtained by dividing the measured transmissivities by the thickness of the <br /> stratum believed to be contributing the water during the tests. In the <br /> cafe of wells LA 221A and LA 218A, this stratum is the coal seam and the <br /> permeability values are those for the coal . The coal permeabilities given <br /> ' in Table 2 fall within the range of coal permeabilities that we have measured <br /> at other locations. The permeability value of 45.4 ft/d is believed to <br /> �j <br />