My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982-08-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
1982-08-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2020 7:25:39 PM
Creation date
12/10/2012 11:27:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/24/1982
Doc Name
Draft Findings Response
From
CF & I Steel Corporation
To
Mined Land Reclamation
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CF&I will perform a transit survey to an appropriate fixed <br /> benchmark (such as a tagged nail, corner of a foundation, or <br /> similar point ) for each of structures 14, 27 , 28 , 31 and 32 . <br /> These structures are identified in Table 17 and on Map 17 of the <br /> permit application. The surveys will be made prior to the area <br /> of influence of underground workings expanding to include these <br /> structures. The survey will establish the location, elevation, <br /> and orientation (by offsets or additional point ) of the <br /> structure. These surveys will be repeated on an annual basis to <br /> monitor for the effects of subsidence . <br /> Should access to any structure noted in the two preceding <br /> paragraphs be denied to CF&I for monitoring purposes , the <br /> Division will be notified and CF&I will request relief from the <br /> monitoring requirement for that structure . <br /> CF&I will perform all monitoring proposed in this section and <br /> maintain records of them at the mine and in the Pueblo office. <br /> The subsidence monitoring monuments to be installed above the <br /> First North Mains shall be revised as follows: The location and <br /> orientation of the line formed by the monuments will be as shown <br /> on Map 17 of the permit application. The spacing between monu- <br /> ments will be revised to approximately 100 feet. This new spacing <br /> will require 15 monuments installed along the alignment to locate <br /> the end points outside the 30-degree angle of draw influence area. <br /> All the subsidence monitoring monuments will consist of 2-in. <br /> diameter, 6-ft long iron pipes driven into 9-inch diameter, 4-ft <br /> deep hole . A 3-in. diameter, flat metal disk will be set on the 2- <br /> in. iron pipe and the hole will be backfilled with Portland Cement <br /> and sand-concrete. In areas where rock is encountered at a depth <br /> of less than 4 ft, the pipe will be driven as far as possible to <br /> provide maximum stability for the monument. The attached sketch <br /> shows a cross-section of a typical monument . <br /> A theoretical calculation of pillar stability with respect to size <br /> and percent extraction has not been made for the Maxwell Mine <br /> operations . The best verification that the mining methods and <br /> pillar configurations that will be employed will not have adverse <br /> effect with respect to subsidence is demonstrated by the past <br /> mining in the same circumstances and conditions which exist at the <br /> Allen Mine. The Allen has been in operation for approximately 30 <br /> years and extensive workings underlie the Purgatoire River. Any <br /> adverse subsidence effect would have been evidenced by excessive <br /> water entry in the mine or effects on the highway and railroad. <br /> This has not occurred. <br /> Mining recovery rates at the Maxwell Mine will not approach the 50 <br /> percent level within the renewable resource area during the five- <br /> year permit term. CF&.I has requested a copy of the technique of <br /> pillar stability calculation from the Division noted in the draft <br /> findings document, for our review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.