My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-10-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
1985-10-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/25/2020 11:37:23 AM
Creation date
12/10/2012 10:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/1/1985
Doc Name
Responses to Stipulations
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Surface water monitoring began in May 1984 at Stations CCS-1 and CCS-2 (Figure <br /> 1). Station CCS-1 is located above mine operations and only one flow event has been <br /> recorded on monthly samplings over the monitoring period (Appendix 1). Station CCS-2 is <br /> located at the confluence with the Purgatoire River. Flow recorded during monthly <br /> samplings is the result of the Golden Eagle Mine discharge which enters Ciruela Canyon <br /> between Stations CCS-1 and CCS-2. There are also two on-stream impoundments in the <br /> upper canyon which retain surface flow for livestock watering. On a seasonal basis, the <br /> only flow observed in Ciruela Canyon has been in the summer as a result of thunderstorms <br /> sufficient enough to produce runoff conditions. <br /> Alluvial water monitoring began in May 1984 with the installation of well CCAW-1 <br /> at the mouth of the canyon. As with well ACAW-1, water levels correspond with surface <br /> water availability, rising during the summer and falling during the winter. In August 1985, <br /> a series of 7 holes were drilled and completed as monitoring wells to further identify <br /> alluvial characteristics (Figure 2 and 3 and Appendix 2). Similar alluvial deposits and <br /> bedrock conditions exist when compared to Apache Canyon. Wells in the lower and upper <br /> canyon exhibit limited or no water while well #3 and #4 are in a narrow steep portion of <br /> the canyon. This area has a deeper colluvium (up to 17 feet) created by deposited <br /> material at the lower end of the canyon. This situation has concentrated water in the <br /> colluvial material forming a pocket as identified by well #3 and #4. In addition, seeps #15 <br /> and #16 have been monitored in the spring and seep survey over the past two years <br /> (Appendix 3). Seep #15 is located between well #5 and #6 and has exhibited the same <br /> limited water condition as the wells. Seep #16 is located above well #6 and exhibits <br /> similar canyon conditions as identified in the well #3 area. <br /> With similar conditions, the same conclusions from Apache Canyon were applied to <br /> Ciruela Canyon. That is, Ciruela Canyon does not contain an alluvial aquifer; and the <br /> Division found it is not an AVF based on size criteria. <br /> Probable Hydrologic Consequence <br /> The New Elk and Golden Eagle Mines five year permits will utilize both room and <br /> pillar and longwall mining methods (Figure 4 and 5). M ining activities will be limited to <br /> the lower limits of Apache and Ciruela Canyons. <br /> -9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.