My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-02-06_REVISION - M1977493 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1996-02-06_REVISION - M1977493 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:27:02 PM
Creation date
12/10/2012 7:27:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/6/1996
Doc Name
EPP
From
Cyprus Climax
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR7
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Allen Sorenson <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />February 1, 1996 <br />Page 5 <br />Phase 1: A formal evaluation by the Division of CMC's report on the magnitude of the <br />seismic event. Data for the Climax Mine are hereby submitted as an attachment <br />to this letter. Please note that the evaluation references the Tenmile Dam (3- <br />Dam) yet is applicable to the entire Climax Mine site. <br />Phase 2: Once the magnitude and return probability analysis has been formally reviewed, <br />CMC and the Division can discuss additional information needs. <br />Regarding instrumentation and static stability evaluation on the tailing impoundments, CMC <br />recognizes that piezometric level can be indicative of dam stability. Tailing facilities at Climax <br />were designed with static stability as a design parameter. CMC views the request for static <br />stability demonstration to be part of Rule 6.5 and will address this issue apart form the EPP <br />review. In general, static stability analyses show that with a high phreatic the tailing dams at <br />Climax maintain a reasonable factor of safety. If the phreatic surface were to approach high <br />levels in the impoundment, however, other operational problems such as localized slumping <br />would ensue. Climax operationally maintains water levels on the ponds to affect control of the <br />phreatic surface. <br />Because of the above discussion, Climax disagrees that piezometer levels on the Climax tailing <br />impoundments should be an enforceable component of the EPP. CMC proposes that summary <br />piezometer data be submitted to the Division on an annual basis. <br />(d) Eagle Park Reservoir, Robinson Lake, Chalk Mountain Reservoir, and Buffehr's Lake are <br />under the jurisdiction of the Office of the State Engineer. The Retention Pond, a small settling <br />pond presently filled with sediment, was used for settling suspended solids in previous water <br />treatment at Climax. It is not regulated by the State Engineer. <br />10. (a) CMC believes that this request is outside of the intent and purview if the EPP. <br />(b) All three tailing impoundments at Climax will pass the Probable Maximum Precipitation <br />(PMP) event under hydologic criteria used by the Office of the State Engineer. Our evaluation <br />shows that the Robinson and Tenmile Tailing Impoundments are capable of passing 100% of <br />the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) under a worse case scenario. The worse case scenario <br />considers both the snowmelt and thunderstorm PMF at pond storage limit with all interceptors <br />washed out. The evaluation of Mayflower Tailing Impoundment shows passage of the PMF at <br />88% with the interceptors intact and 77% under the worse case storm conditions described <br />above. The rules for Class I dams regulated by the Office of the State Engineer define a dam <br />capable of passing 75% of the PMF with one foot of residual freeboard meets appropriate <br />design criteria. Based on our evaluation using more conservative freeboard criteria, all tailing <br />facilities can safely contain the inflow design flood. Static stability evaluations outlined under <br />item 9 (c) of this letter may result in increased minimum freeboards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.