My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-03-03_REPORT - C1981013 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
1986-03-03_REPORT - C1981013 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2020 5:16:44 AM
Creation date
12/7/2012 1:14:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/3/1986
Doc Name
1985 Annual Hydrology Report (Part 2 of 2)
From
Wyoming Fuel Company
Annual Report Year
1985
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E rr),� <br /> DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> Da,.,d H Ge•cnes E�ecunve Director e <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br /> DATE: September 3, 1985 <br /> TO: Jeffrey Deckler <br /> FROM: Candace Thompson <br /> RE: Wyoming Fuels Surface and Ground Water Monitoring Progress <br /> for the New Elk and Golden Eagle Mines <br /> I have reviewed Dave Stout' s letter of August 6, 1995 and have the following <br /> corlments addressing his numbered concerns. <br /> 1 . Stipulation No. 8 of the New Elk Permit Revision has been revised as <br /> shown on the enclosed monitoring requirements list. <br /> 2. CCAW-1 and ACAW-1 were inadvertently omitted from the list. Wyoming <br /> Fuels should continue monitoring these as required on the attached sheet. <br /> 3. The long list has been dropped from the monitoring requirements. The <br /> Division agrees with the point that the present data shows no probleri <br /> with these parameters. Also, the mining operation will continue in the <br /> same seams as previously disturbed and the surface operations are such <br /> that no new sources for these parameters should be present. <br /> 4. Springs and seeps numbered 12 through 19 were all listed as sources of <br /> livestock and wildlife water. For this reason, it is important that the <br /> springs and seeps be monitored at least on an annual basis as the mining <br /> activity has the potential to affect these water sources. <br /> After further review of the spring and seep survey, it was noted that <br /> Spring No. 14 feeds a stockpond in Apache Canyon. Flow could not be <br /> measured due to the ponding. However, the Division requires that in the <br /> future a reference point on the pond embankment be established whereby <br /> water level in the pond can be noted during the annual survey. <br /> A,:gust surveying of the springs is appropriate for the area due to the <br /> fait that highest precipitation for the area occurs during June, July a.id <br /> Nuyusc supplying recharge to the aquifers. <br /> Stipulation No. 12 of the New Elk Findings and Stipulation No. 10 of the <br /> Golden Eagle Findings are revised as follows to include the present <br /> r,onitoring plan for both mines . <br /> -29- <br /> 4?3 (-~-'annul RmIriinn 1111 .1;hPrman 1;trPPt npnvar C'nlnrnrin P0901 Tal cin.,tl RF.R,- ;Sh7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.