My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-09-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977493
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1996-09-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2021 6:53:04 AM
Creation date
12/7/2012 11:09:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
9/25/1996
Doc Name
Tailing Removal Project in Eagle Park Reservoir
From
Climax
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Clapper and Mr. Romig <br /> September 24, 1996 <br /> Page 4 <br /> gpm when the reservoir is full. The actual embankment seepage will most likely be <br /> somewhat less than this, and probably within an order of magnitude. <br /> Seepage through the foundation of the dam embankment is potentially a significant <br /> source of inflow to the collection system. It is nearly impossible to estimate the expected <br /> foundation seepage increase. Historically, it does not appear that foundation seepage has <br /> been significant. However, the possibility exists that there are more permeable zones in <br /> the bedrock above the historic water levels in the reservoir, or that there are <br /> undocumented flowpaths that were historically sealed by the fairly impermeable tailing <br /> material. The original design reports for the embankment state that a fractured zone of <br /> clay shale was encountered near the emergency spillway. A silt-clay blanket seat was <br /> placed over the fractured zone. The water level In the Impoundment has not historically <br /> been high enough to test the effectiveness of this seal. <br /> Based on the items discussed above the modified seepwater return system was <br /> designed for a maximum pumping capacity of 650 to 650 gpm. This flowrate seemed <br /> reasonable considering the likelihood that the seepage rate will increase, and that the <br /> magnitude of the increase is somewhat uncertain at this time. <br /> A new pipeline will be required to deliver water from the toe of Dam 4 to Robinson <br /> Reservoir. We propose that 8-inch diameter HDPE pipe with butt-fused joints be used for <br /> the pipeline. The pressure rating of the pipe would decrease as the pipeline elevation <br /> Increases up the hill. The route of the pipeline would basically follow existing roadways <br /> for the most part (ref. dwgs D4.2-01 to 03). Beginning at the pump station, the pipeline <br /> would follow the road up the south groin of the dam,extend through the embankment, and <br /> cross under the emergency spillway. The pipeline would then follow the road along the <br /> SO' d NO' ON 2b: T T 96 bZ daS NK-T9Z-S�02-T : 131 aOSSd -8 .jai aaym - m. m <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.