My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-01-27_REVISION - M1977493 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1994-01-27_REVISION - M1977493 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:23:31 PM
Creation date
12/5/2012 9:17:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/27/1994
Doc Name
TR Approval
From
DMG
To
Climax
Type & Sequence
TR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICLIN&X MOLYBOENL. vl COMPANY <br /> 999 Climax Mine A unit of AMAX Inc. <br /> January 24 , 1994 <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Division 19,94. <br /> Division of Minerals and Geology <br /> 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver , CO 80203 <br /> Certified Mail No . . P 439 322 547 <br /> Re : Climax Mine Permit No . 7 -493 Technical Revisions TR-005 <br /> Gentlemen : <br /> The issues relative to TR-005 which the Division has <br /> requested clarification are addressed 'herein as follows : <br /> 1 . Bonding for reclamation of the former Moiy-Oxide Pond. <br /> In the most recent corres�,ondence , the Division states <br /> that the "project must be properly bonded since the <br /> approvec end ! and use of Developed Water Resources <br /> cannot be attained without removal of the tailings . " As <br /> stated in the technical revision application , removable <br /> of the tailings is t",e most feasible method for Climax <br /> purposes of a-Ffectinq the reservoir conversion . This <br /> statement was not intended to imply that it was the only <br /> method of conversion . In studies by independenit <br /> consulting engineering firms , removal of the tailings is <br /> but one caption of several different alternatives which <br /> could be utilized to affect the same final use . . The <br /> estimated cost that was presentee in tre technical <br /> revision application was for redevelopment , and not <br /> reclamation of the facility . Climax will adequately <br /> address any bonding issues in the requested information <br /> that wi ! ! be submitted to the Div lion relative to the <br /> forthcoming bond review <br /> 2 . Surface water impact during the tailing relocation process . <br /> The Division is welcome to inspect any of the spill <br /> prevention facilities , and maKe any recommendations , <br /> however the final regulatory authority as to the adequacy <br /> of any ID ! containment and prevention facilities will <br /> be tree Colorado Department of !-lea ! to Water Qua i i ty <br /> Control Division since .ai1v potential discharges would <br /> fail under their jurisdiction and the Clean Water Act and <br /> NPDES requIatIons . <br /> Climax, Colorado 80429 Phone: (719) 486-2150 Telecopier Ext. 540 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.