My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1978-02-10_PERMIT FILE - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1978-02-10_PERMIT FILE - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2020 6:32:32 AM
Creation date
11/29/2012 7:21:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/10/1978
Doc Name
Permit Application Questions
From
Climax
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Page ,1- <br /> • <br /> a. If treatment of water must occur after mining (and even during) <br /> where is the sludge disposed? <br /> 4. Page 2 - 2: Does all water get recycled or is some water lost by <br /> seepage? If no, where does it go? <br /> 5. Page 2 - 6: You state it will only be a matter of time before <br /> benches visibly disappear. How long? Could some application be <br /> used to break up the remaining bench pattern or accelerate the <br /> obliteration? <br /> 6. Page 2 - 6: You seem to be saying that the primary criterion for <br /> deciding where what waste goes is access to a dump area. Is there <br /> some way to separate more favorable materials and place them in <br /> locations where they can do the most good? <br /> 7. Page 6 - 1: Does Climax Molybdenum Company consider that land they <br /> call "reclaimed" is not affected hand? <br /> S. Page 6 - 2 and 3: Are these "excluded" canals and ditches still used? <br /> If so, they are affected land and should be bonded unless they are <br /> clearly excludable as being acceptably reclaimed. <br /> 9. Page 8 - 18: If the Clinton Canal needs to be maintained, how much <br /> maintenance is required, and who will do it? <br /> 10. Page 8 - 19: How much water will these 42" decant lines carry? Will <br /> it be sufficient to prevent -ay ponding at the "probably maximum flood?" <br /> 11. Page 8 - 15 (et al) : What happens after the wire holding the gabions <br /> in the intercepts canals disintigrates? Where does the stability <br /> come from? Wouldn't it be necessary to periodically clean out the <br /> canals of debris that accumulates? What GFS were the canals designed <br /> to handle? What is the "probably maximum flood" US? <br /> 12. Page 8 - 12 and 1: What techniques will be used in directing the <br /> pond-to-pond flow so as to prevent channel cutting into the tailings <br /> below the rock veneers? <br /> 13. Page 10 - 8 and 9: On the shrub plantings, we need a more definitive <br /> statement as to what you would plant now if you had to reclaim it now. <br /> Also, we need an indication of the pattern of planting that would be <br /> used. <br /> 14. Page 10 - 11: What is your bast estimate of the duration of the <br /> fertilizer maintenance program? <br /> 15. Page 10 - 12 and 13: There is too much emphasis on research problems <br /> and not sufficient information on what would be done now if you had to <br /> do it now. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.