My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-11-14_HYDROLOGY - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2012-11-14_HYDROLOGY - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:26:59 PM
Creation date
11/14/2012 2:33:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
11/14/2012
Doc Name
3RD QTR GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
From
GCC RIO GRANDE
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
have followed dry summers with little fall precipitation. Low groundwater levels may tend <br />to concentrate dissolved chemical species, raising the level of TDS. GCC expected to see <br />TDS concentrations decrease in the current spring and early summer sampling events. <br />However, winter precipitation has been below normal, with Colorado experiencing an <br />extended drought, and the effects of these dry conditions may be resulting in continued <br />elevated TDS and sulfate concentrations in the alluvial groundwater. <br />Field Parameters <br />Field parameters including temperature, pH, and conductivity were collected during the <br />September 2012 sampling event. Results of the field parameter monitoring are provided in <br />Table 1. The data collected indicate that pH at the site is very close to neutral. <br />Conductivity continues to be elevated at well MW -04. Elevated conductivity can be <br />directly correlated to elevated TDS. <br />http: // groundwater .ucdavis.edu /Publications/Harter FWQFS 8084.pdf <br />Quality Control <br />One set of field duplicate samples was collected during the monitoring event. Sample <br />DUP -01 was submitted as a blind field duplicate of primary alluvial well sample MW -02. <br />Field duplicate precision is measured as the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) between the <br />primary and duplicate sample results. The RPD is defined as the "absolute value of the <br />difference between the primary and duplicate results, divided by the average of the two <br />results." Precision between the TDS results is very good for the duplicate pair. <br />One equipment rinsate blank was collected during the September 26, 2012 monitoring <br />event for analysis of TDS. The blank was collected by pouring laboratory- supplied de- <br />ionized water through a new bailer and into the appropriate sample bottles. TDS was <br />detected in the equipment blank at the reporting limit of 10 mg/L. This concentration is <br />orders of magnitude less than the TDS detections in the groundwater samples, and no bias <br />to the sample results is indicated. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Results of the third quarter 2012 groundwater sampling performed at the GCC Rio Grande <br />Cement Plant during September 2012 are presented herein. Samples were submitted for <br />analysis of TDS only. <br />TDS concentrations at MW -03 have exceeded NPLs in three consecutive events leading up <br />to the current event. Steadily declining water levels have been observed in all wells, as the <br />St. Charles River has gone dry. MW -03 was dry, and no sample was collected. The TDS <br />concentration at well MW -04 slightly exceeded the NPL. TDS concentrations at MW -04 <br />have fluctuated around the NPL, but no trend is apparent. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.