My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-11-05_REVISION - C1982056 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2012-11-05_REVISION - C1982056 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:10:19 PM
Creation date
11/13/2012 2:37:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/5/2012
Doc Name
Letter & Application
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL1
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additional field trials by the SCS and the Colorado Yampa Coal Company <br />on Energy Mine No. 1 found the species most suitable for erosion <br />control on reclaimed lands were meadow brome, smooth brome, and <br />intermediate wheatgrass. Cicer milkvetch also performed <br />satisfactorily. <br />As concluded in the above cited reports, introduced species are <br />capable of rapidly stabilizing disturbed areas. The ability of, exotic <br />species to effectively control erosion is attributable to the early, <br />rapid growth they exhibit and their survival characteristics under <br />adverse conditions. These same reports document that the introduced <br />species are capable of providing a permanent vegetation cover, have a <br />longer life span and are more prolific than some of the slower <br />developing native species. <br />The proposed introduced species are currently encountered in Routt <br />County. All are deemed desirable from a range seeding and wildlife <br />management standpoint. Their nutritional value for and compatibility <br />with livestock and wildlife are well documented. Mule deer <br />preferences for intermediate wheatgrass, desert wheatgrass, <br />orchardgrass, timothy, brome grass, alfalfa, and milkvetch are <br />documented by Kufeld, et. al., (1973). Elk preferences are reported <br />by Kufeld (1973) to include desert wheatgrass, timothy, brome, <br />alfalfa, milkvetch and small burnet. Plummer, et. al., (1968) report <br />that studies in Utah have shown big -game prefer alfalfa, small burnet, <br />desert wheatgrass, intermediate wheatgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, <br />smooth brome, and orchardgrass. <br />Livestock forage preference for the proposed introduced species has <br />been documented by Marquiss, et. al., (1974). Palatability ratings in <br />order of descending preferences were: smooth brome, intermediate <br />wheatgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, desert wheatgrass, western <br />wheatgrass, and beardless wheatgrass. In a study spanning almost 30 <br />years in which some 127 species of grasses were planted, Gomm (1969) <br />2.05 -42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.