My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980-10-20_REVISION - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1980-10-20_REVISION - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 10:58:18 AM
Creation date
11/7/2012 6:51:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/20/1980
Doc Name
Response
From
Climax
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLIMAX III 'I UM COMPANY <br /> CRIOLVDDIENUM IIIIIIIIIIIIII <br /> 999 Mx wr- <br /> Climax, Colorado 80429 <br /> (303) 486-2150 <br /> GOLDEN, COLORADO OFFICE: 13949 WEST COLFAX AVENUE 80401 <br /> October 20 , 1980 ,/ <br /> Mr. James B. McArdle <br /> Reclamation Specialist <br /> Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Section <br /> 423 Centennial Building 4-0 <br /> 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> Re : Climax Mine Amendment, Your File No. 77-493 <br /> Dear Mr. McArdle : <br /> Enclosed is our response to your letter of September 5 , <br /> 1980 . We hope it adequately addresses your concerns . <br /> As noted in Mr. Distler' s letter of July 10 , 1980 , we <br /> have not proposed any significant changes in the mining and <br /> reclamation plans heretofore approved by the Board. The <br /> information in this response, therefore, should not be <br /> construed as altering existing or creating new obligations <br /> as to matters not covered by the amendment. <br /> We do understand , however, your desire for explanatory <br /> information which may enhance your understanding of our <br /> program and have tried to answer your questions accordingly. <br /> We also understand that you would prefer rescheduling <br /> the hearing of this matter by the Board to their November <br /> 1980 meeting in order that you may obtain comments from <br /> certain State agencies that have not yet responded to you. <br /> Although we are prepared to proceed at the October 1980 <br /> meeting , we concur with this deferral until the November <br /> 1980 meeting . <br /> Please give me a call after you have had a chance to <br /> review the answers herein. In view of the many matters <br /> covered by your "adequacy" letter, it is important that we <br /> meet before presenting this amendment before the Board. <br /> rrely, <br /> uck <br /> Environmental Engineer <br /> RZ :mm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.