My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1991078
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1991078
>
_INSPECTION - C1991078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2020 3:08:29 PM
Creation date
10/24/2012 12:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Johnny Rich & Jim Stover
Inspection Date
10/23/2012
Email Name
MLT
SB1
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 23, 2012 C-1991-078/Hamilton Mine MLT <br /> Inspection Topic Summary <br /> NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted <br /> V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br /> NA - Air Resource Protection Y -Roads <br /> N - Availability of Records R -Reclamation Success <br /> NA -Backfill & Grading R -Revegetation <br /> NA -Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste NA - Subsidence <br /> NA -Explosives NA - Slides and Other Damage <br /> R -Fish& Wildlife NA - Support Facilities On-site <br /> R -Hydrologic Balance Y - Signs and Markers <br /> NA - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan NA - Support Facilities Not On-site <br /> N - Other NA - Special Categories Of Mining <br /> NA -Processing Waste Y - Topsoil <br /> COMMENTS <br /> A partial inspection of the Hamilton Mine was conducted on Tuesday, October 23, 2012 by <br /> Marcia Talvitie of the Division. Skies were clear and the temperature was warm. The day was <br /> windy. <br /> The inspection focused on Mining Area No. 1 and Sediment Pond B. Mining Area No. 3 was <br /> not inspected. <br /> FISH and WILDLIFE—Rule 4.18: <br /> • A few deer prints were scattered throughout the reclaimed area, but no deer were seen. There <br /> is no water in the immediate vicinity; the closest source may be Naturita Creek, or certainly <br /> the San Miguel River. <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05 <br /> Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures <br /> 4.05.7, 4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br /> Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage—Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments <br /> 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> • Pond B, which has been approved as a permanent structure, was entirely dry. <br /> • The dam for Pond B was reasonably well vegetated, and both spillways were unobstructed <br /> and in good repair. <br /> • Collection ditches entering the pond from the southeast and southwest corners appear to be <br /> stable. (Photos 1 and 2) <br /> • The pond floor is covered with foxtail, which has been grazed down by cattle or wildlife. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.