My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-09-28_REVISION - M1977307 (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977307
>
2012-09-28_REVISION - M1977307 (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:25:47 PM
Creation date
10/23/2012 8:09:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977307
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/28/2012
Doc Name
EPP Submittal- Ex. F to Emergency Response and Control Plan
From
Cotter
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vanadium concentrations exceeded State Agricultural Guideline. Since it is unlikely that <br />the arid region along the hillside where the mine portal is located will be farmed, <br />vanadium is not a concern. <br />There are significant radiological concerns at the site based on the gross alpha and radium <br />226 values in the SPLP tests. Radium concentrations are nearly 3 orders of magnitude <br />above drinking water standards. The likelihood of radium impacting groundwater <br />resources in the area has been discussed (section 8.0) and deemed minimal. However, all <br />necessary precautions should be taken to prevent runoff from waste rock areas from <br />leaving the site. This concern is addressed in the Drainage Design Plan found in <br />Appendix III. <br />14.2 Mobility of Detected Uranium Ore Related Constituents <br />Two factors control the mobility of constituents identified in the SPLP analysis - <br />precipitation and sorption. Limited precipitation in the area combined with high <br />evapotranspiration rates make it unlikely that sufficient precipitation is available to <br />mobilize ore related constituents any significant distances. The most likely scenario is <br />that any precipitation that falls in the area would be contained in the topsoil and used by <br />plants covering the waste -rock stockpiles once future mining and remediation is <br />completed. <br />The simplest and most common method of estimating contaminant retardation is based on <br />the partition (or distribution) coefficient, K The K parameter is a factor related to the <br />partitioning of a contaminant between the solid and aqueous phases. It is an empirical <br />unit of measurement that attempts to account for various chemical and physical <br />retardation mechanisms that are influenced by a myriad of variables. The Kd metric is the <br />most common measure used in transport codes to describe the extent to which <br />contaminants are sorbed to soils. A primary advantage of the Kd model is that it is easily <br />inserted into hydrologic transport codes to quantify reduction in the rate of transport of <br />the contaminant relative to groundwater, either by advection or diffusion. <br />The partition coefficient, Kd, is defined as the ratio of the quantity of the adsorbate <br />adsorbed per mass of solid to the amount of the adsorbate remaining in solution at <br />equilibrium. For the reaction <br />the mass action expression for K is <br />A + C, = A, <br />Kd = Mass of Adsorbate Sorbed (A, ) <br />Mass of Adsorbate in Solution (C; ) <br />O'Connor Design Group Inc. T - 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.