Laserfiche WebLink
increasing amounts of uraninite in deeper deposits began to raise a valence problem. The <br />possibility began to develop that uraninite is an early uranium mineral and that carnotite <br />is an oxidation product - the result of weathering (Garrels and Christ, 1965). <br />Hostetler and Garrels (1962) used Eh -pH diagram to illustrate the conditions under which <br />uranium might be transported in underground waters in the presence of vanadium. The <br />diagrams show for conditions of groundwater with a pH greater than 2 and oxidizing <br />conditions, carnotite is stable and the dominant mineral. Several other studies suggest <br />that uranium minerals, especially minerals that contain vanadium, are relatively insoluble <br />including carnotite. <br />8.6 Mobilization of Uranium Related Constituents <br />With an understanding of the site geology, hydrology, and geochemistry, a scenario of <br />possible mobilization and transport of uranium and related constituents needs to be <br />developed to design an effective monitoring strategy. Mining would disturb the uranium <br />deposits by introducing oxygen into reduced mineralized zones. It is possible that <br />changes in redox conditions could mobilize uranium related constituents but the <br />geochemistry indicates that only limited amounts could be mobilized due to the low <br />solubility of these uranium minerals. The lack of groundwater in the area further <br />prevents a viable pathway for the transport of these constituents. If groundwater was <br />encountered in sufficient quantities to transport the uranium and related constituents (all <br />hydrologic data suggests this is not the case), then groundwater in the upper Salt Wash <br />sandstone would migrate down dip toward the syncline between the Paradox and <br />Uncompahgre uplifts and toward the San Miguel River. <br />Kearl (2005) conducted transport modeling studies to estimate the transport of mineral <br />constituents associated with uranium ore deposits at the SM -18 Mine, approximately 2 <br />miles to the north. These studies assumed that the Entrada Sandstone was the upper most <br />aquifer in the area. A conservative approach consistent with the Nuclear Regulatory <br />Commission requirements for high -level nuclear waste sites was used to develop a worst - <br />case scenario - not necessarily the most likely scenario. Even under the worst case <br />conditions, the modeling predicted that after 1000 years, uranium related constituents <br />migrated approximately 200 feet vertically at a concentration of 10 -6 (1 /1,000,000 of the <br />source concentration) of the initial concentration in the pore water of the waste rock. The <br />uranium plume is contained in the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. The <br />plume does not enter the Entrada Sandstone. The Summerville Formation provides an <br />additional buffer zone restricting potential contamination from entering the groundwater. <br />The limited well data for the area suggests that the Entrada Sandstone is dry and the <br />Wingate Sandstone is the upper most aquifer. With the low permeability values <br />measured in the Peel Engineering study for the Kayenta Formation that overlies the <br />Wingate Sandstone, there is even less likelihood of uranium mining impacting valuable <br />local groundwater resources. <br />The results of this analysis indicate that conditions are not conducive to the transport of <br />uranium related constituents to the environment. Geochemistry suggests that <br />O'Connor Design Group Inc. T - 15 <br />