My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-10-01_REVISION - M1977310 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977310
>
2012-10-01_REVISION - M1977310 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:26:51 PM
Creation date
10/23/2012 7:10:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977310
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/1/2012
Doc Name
EPP
From
Cotter
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JD -6 Mine Environmental Protection Plan 34 <br />9.2 Regional Groundwater System <br />9.2.1 Hydrostratigraphic Units <br />The regional groundwater system in the Paradox Basin consists of an upper Mesozoic sandstone aquifer <br />and a lower Paleozoic carbonate aquifer (Topper, et al., 2003), separated by a thick sequence of Mesozoic - <br />Upper Paleozoic confining beds and salt confining beds (including the Paradox Member of the Hermosa <br />Formation). The hydrostratigraphic units of the Paradox Valley are shown in Table 20. <br />The upper Mesozoic sandstone aquifer has been called the N- aquifer elsewhere on the Colorado Plateau, <br />where the Navajo Sandstone and Wingate Sandstone are the main water bearing units in the N- aquifer over <br />large portions of Utah and Arizona. Although the Navajo Sandstone and Wingate Sandstone, where <br />present, are the main water - bearing units in the Mesozoic sandstone aquifer, these units are missing from <br />portions of the Paradox Valley.In the Paradox Basin, the Mesozoic sandstone aquifer includes interbedded <br />sandstones, siltstones, and shales which are bounded at the top by the Mancos Shale and on the bottom by <br />mudstones, siltstones, and salt beds (Table 20). As reported by Golder (2009a), along the axis of the <br />eastern Paradox Valley: <br />"Although numerous reports [have been] published to address the regional hydrogeology, <br />no published research has focused on the hydrogeology of the eastern Paradox Valley. <br />Many of the regional studies name the Navajo Sandstone, Wingate Sandstone, and the <br />Entrada Sandstone as important bedrock aquifers. However, these formations are either <br />absent or not known to be water - bearing within the project study area, resulting in almost <br />no relevant published information on groundwater ". <br />-- Golder (2009a) <br />The confining beds between the upper Mesozoic aquifer and the lower Paleozoic aquifer include the <br />Dolores Formation (mudstone and fine- grained sandstone which are not water- bearing), Chinle Formation <br />(interbedded shales and siltstones with minor fine- grained sandstone, which may be water- bearing in some <br />places), Moenkopi Formation (mudstone interbedded with minor sandstone, which may yield small <br />quantities of water), and Cutler Formation (fine grained sandstone interbedded with minor conglomerate <br />and mudstone which may yield small quantities of water). The most significant confining beds are the <br />Hermosa Formation, which consists of salt beds (including the Paradox Member). <br />The confining units described in regional studies of the Paradox Basin were defined as aquifers in the <br />hydrogeologic study of the Pinon Ridge site. Golder (2009a) found that groundwater occurs in two units: <br />first at the base of the Chinle Formation at depths of 340 — 400 feet and second at the base of the Moenkopi <br />Formation at depths of approximately 870 feet. For baseline hydrologic characterization in the valley floor, <br />Golder drilled 35 boreholes, of which nine were completed as monitoring wells (MW- series), three were <br />completed as production wells (PW- series), six were completed as observation wells near the production <br />wells, and the remaining holes were groundwater exploratory boreholes (EX- series). The investigation <br />revealed that no groundwater occurred in the alluvium, and "the only known groundwater occurrences <br />within the study area are close to the contact between the Chinle and Moenkopi formations, and close to the <br />contact between the Moenkopi and Hermosa formations" (Golder, 2009a). The Hermosa (salt) formations <br />impeded the downward migration of groundwater flow. <br />The lower Paleozoic carbonate aquifer includes the Leadville Limestone and other porous and permeable <br />limestones and dolomites, which transmits saltwater through fractures. Groundwater in the lower Paleozoic <br />carbonate aquifer is not suitable for human consumption (Topper, et al., 2003). <br />4148A.120927 Whetstone Associates • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.