My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-10-01_REVISION - M1977310 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977310
>
2012-10-01_REVISION - M1977310 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:26:51 PM
Creation date
10/23/2012 7:10:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977310
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/1/2012
Doc Name
EPP
From
Cotter
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JD -6 Mine Environmental Protection Plan 17 <br />would be presented in the field; (b) the tumbling process provides the maximum exposure <br />of all potentially reactive sites to the leachant; and (c) the tumbling process exposes even <br />more surface area through semi - autogenous grinding." <br />DRMS (2006) <br />The SPLP test uses a water:rock ratio of 20:1. If the results are applied to the site, the analysis inherently <br />assumes that water is available in the environment to leach constituents from the rock. As discussed in the <br />site hydrologic summary, potential evaporation (PE) exceeds precipitation (P) in the region. Although <br />PE >P does not ensure that no water would ever migrate through the waste rock or temporary ore stockpile, <br />the amount of water available to leach and transport elements is limited. <br />5.4.2.2 Transport <br />The transport of constituents from the JD -6 Mine waste rock pile will be limited by low infiltration rates <br />and therefore low transport velocities in the unsaturated zone (a.k.a., vadose zone). Infiltration modeling <br />performed for the nearby JD -7 Mine reclaimed waste rock pile indicated that 0.21 in /yr (0.53 cm /yr) of <br />meteoric water might infiltrate through the waste rock pile under normal site conditions. The model results <br />indicated that approximately 98.1% of the precipitation would be consumed by evapotranspiration (ET) and <br />runoff would be negligible. These results correspond well with reported average recharge rates for the arid- <br />semiarid southwestern United States. Scanlon, et al., (2006) reported an average recharge rate of 0.44 in/yr <br />(1.12 cm /yr), corresponding to annual precipitation of 11.9 inches (30.1 cm). If vegetation is fully <br />established and sage brush succeeds grasses on the reclaimed waste rock pile, the model results indicated <br />that infiltration would decrease to 0.10 in /yr (0.25 cm /yr). <br />Given the low infiltration rates, the rate of vertical transport of soluble constituents from the waste rock pile <br />to underlying groundwater would be low. Hydrologic modeling performed by GeoScience Services (2005) <br />for the JD -6 Mine and the SM -18 Mine suggested that any downward vertical migration of fluid or <br />constituents from the waste rock pile would be limited by the sorption coefficients (K and low transport <br />velocities. For example, using a source term of 2.7 mg /L U and a Kd of 0.036 m /Kg in sand and 0.60 <br />m /Kg in clay, uranium would migrate approximately 200 ft vertically at a concentration of 1/1000 of the <br />original source concentration. Selenium would be transported 80 feet vertically at a concentration of <br />1 /1000` of the original source concentration. The PORFLOW model simulation is considered to be <br />environmentally conservative for several reasons, including the constant flux rate of 1.2 in/yr which is <br />nearly three times the infiltration rate predicted by the HYDRUS modeling of the reclaimed waste rock pile <br />at the nearby JD -7 Mine. The PORFLOW model results showed that no contamination would reach an <br />underlying groundwater system. For all the analytes modeled, none would migrate through the Salt Wash <br />Member of the Morrison Formation. The Summerville Formation provides an additional barrier preventing <br />the constituents of concern from impacting any groundwater in the underlying Entrada Sandstone. <br />It is noted that higher infiltration rates through the unlined stormwater catchment, located adjacent to the <br />JD -6 Mine waste rock pile, could have produced higher vertical transport velocities than what occurs <br />elsewhere on the JD -6 Mine site. This stormwater catchment will be lined as described in the Stormwater <br />Management Plan (Attachment 3). <br />5.4.2.3 Uptake <br />The third component of an environmental exposure pathway is uptake by human or biological receptors. <br />The inventory of surface water features (Section 8.1) indicates that no perennial streams have been mapped <br />within two miles downstream of the JD -6 Mine. The surface water exposure pathway is limited to <br />intermittent or ephemeral drainages that could contain water for very short time periods immediately after <br />4148A.120927 Whetstone Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.