My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (171)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (171)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 8:23:22 AM
Creation date
10/19/2012 10:20:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Court Appeals
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 34-33-123 (12) , C.R.S . provides that the Board or <br /> Division of Minerals and Geology may request the attorney general <br /> to file suit whenever the permittee or an agent of such permittee <br /> violates or fails to comply with an order issued by the Board or <br /> Division. Pursuant to this statute and in an effort to reclaim <br /> the mine site, the plaintiff filed the present cause of action in <br /> Pitkin County against the defendants as agents of the bankrupt <br /> mining company (v. 1, pp. 8-13) . The case was later transferred <br /> to Judge William L. Jones of Eagle County (v. 1, p. 102) . <br /> The amended- complaint requested an injunction ordering the <br /> defendants to perform reclamation according to the reclamation <br /> plan, the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act and <br /> regulations promulgated thereunder, and the reclamation schedule, <br /> and to maintain the site in compliance with applicable law (v. 1, <br /> pp. 12-13) . In the alternative, the amended complaint requested <br /> the defendants to pay for the cost of reclamation (v. 1, p. 13) . <br /> The complaint provided that the estimated cost of reclamation was <br /> $3 million (v. 1, p. 9) . <br /> In their answer to the complaint , the defendants admitted <br /> that the individual defendants (Diane Delaney; Robert Delaney; <br /> and John Reeves) had acted as spokespersons for the bankrupt <br /> company; that Robert Delaney and John Reeves were officers and <br /> directors of the company; and that defendant Mid-Continent <br /> Minerals Corporation wholly owned MCR (v. 1, pp. 18-19) . (Robert <br /> Delaney and John Reeves were also officers and directors of <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.