My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (171)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (171)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 8:23:22 AM
Creation date
10/19/2012 10:20:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Court Appeals
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Colo. 1988) (where statute establishes legal right to assert <br /> claim, equitable estoppel cannot be used -to circumscribe that <br /> right) ; Matter of Death of Peterkin, 698 P.2d 1353 (Colo. App. <br /> 1985) , aff'd 729 P.2d 977 (Colo. 1986) (powers and authority of <br /> Industrial Commission are derived solely from statute and any <br /> limitation thereon cannot be waived, enlarged, diminished or <br /> destroyed by consent and cannot be estopped) . <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> In this case, estoppel was not proven. At worst, there is <br /> absolutely no evidence to support the judge' s findings on this <br /> issue and, thus, he should be reversed. At best, the existence <br /> of each of the elements of estoppel involved disputed issues of <br /> material fact . Consequently, summary judgment was not <br /> appropriate. <br /> In addition, application of the doctrine here undermines <br /> important governmental policies and should not have been imposed <br /> by the trial court . For the foregoing reasons and authorities, <br /> the trial court' s granting of summary judgment in regard to the <br /> issue of estoppel should be reversed. <br /> GALE A. NORTON <br /> Attorney General <br /> TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH <br /> Solicitor General <br /> JENNIFER L. GIMBEL <br /> Deputy Attorney General <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.