Laserfiche WebLink
( 1952) ; Norton v. Leadville Corp. , 43 Colo. App. 527 , 610 P. 2d <br /> 1348 (1979) . <br /> The defendants must show affirmatively that the plaintiff <br /> would not be entitled to recover under any and all circumstances. <br /> Discovery Land and Dev. Co v Colorado-Aspen Dev. Company, 40 <br /> Colo. App. 292 , 577 P. 2d 1101 (1977) . Where reasonable people <br /> could disagree, summary judgment is inappropriate. Jafay v. <br /> Board of County Commis of Boulder County, 848 P. 2d 892 (Colo. <br /> 1993) . <br /> B. REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF <br /> The defendants argue that since the Division has assumed the <br /> responsibility of procuring contracts concerning reclamation of <br /> the mine site, Resources is no longer in control of reclamation <br /> and therefore the defendant-aqents cannot be ordered to perform <br /> reclamation. The defendants' argument fails . A brief discussion <br /> of the background of this issue is necessary to address the <br /> defendants' claim. <br /> Resources' liquidation plan mandates that any funds for <br /> reclamation of the mine site from the plan go to the Division. <br /> Under state procurement laws , once these funds reach the <br /> Division, they become public funds. As public funds, the <br /> Division is required to meet Procurement Code competitive bidding <br /> standards . See generally Section 24-101-101 , et. seg. , C.R. S. <br /> ( 1988) . In addition, the Colorado Surface Coal Mining <br /> -7- <br />